Skip to content
Open access

Mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure in relation to cardiovascular disease risk among individuals with diabetes

Aug 2026 · BMC Endocrine Disorders · 0 citations

TL;DR

Elevated MAP was consistently associated with CVD risk in individuals with diabetes, while PP variability offered additional prognostic information, and integrated monitoring of MAP levels and PP variability may help refine vascular risk stratification, pending external validation.

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is elevated in diabetes, but the contributions of mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse pressure (PP), and their long-term variability remain unclear. We analyzed 1,065 individuals with diabetes from the nationally representative CHARLS cohort (2011–2020). PP and MAP, plus BP variability metrics, were evaluated for incident CVD using logistic and Cox models, with subgroup, spline, and sensitivity analyses. BP variability was assessed using repeated measurements of PP and MAP in 2011, 2013, and 2015, with within-participant indices including mean, standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), average real variability (ARV), root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), range, variance (PV), and variability independent of the mean (VIM). Over a median 9-year follow-up, 256 (24.0%) participants developed CVD. Baseline MAP was consistently associated with CVD risk (per SD: hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% CI: 1.08–1.52). PP-CVD associations weakened after adjustment. BP variability analyses showed no significant associations for MAP variability, whereas higher PP SD, ARV, RMSSD, range, and variance were associated with 18–25% higher CVD risk in fully adjusted models. Elevated MAP was consistently associated with CVD risk in individuals with diabetes, while PP variability offered additional prognostic information. Integrated monitoring of MAP levels and PP variability may help refine vascular risk stratification, pending external validation. Not applicable.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Multiple blood pressure parameters and risk of incident diabetes in adults with elevated blood pressure: a cohort study with non-linear analyses

SBP showed the highest predictive performance, suggesting that BP parameters may provide simple supplementary information for diabetes risk stratification in this high-risk population, and significant non-linear dose–response relationships were observed.

Qiao-Feng Wu, Yu-Ting Gao, An-Wen Yu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Hemodynamic phenotypes defined by arterial stiffness index and pulse pressure with risk of diabetic microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes

Hemodynamic phenotypes defined by ASI and PP were associated with differential risks of DMC in T2D, and distinct associations of ASI and PP suggest heterogeneous hemodynamic pathways underlying DMC.

Ao-Chuan Sun, Hao Liu, Xu-Sheng Yang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Blood pressure phenotypes and hypertension-associated cardiac damage

The prevalence of hypertension-associated cardiac damage was higher in WCHT and in MHT compared to SNT and WCHT should be considered when assessing cardiovascular risk, and BP should be measured both in the office and at home when diagnosing and monitoring hypertension.

M. Randjelovic, M. Wijkman, Karin Festin et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Blood pressure variability between radial artery and finger is influenced by haemodynamic factors, age, and insulin resistance.

High mean arterial pressure is a major factor contributing to greater blood pressure difference between the radial and finger sites, however, the difference is also more pronounced in the presence of lower large artery stiffness, lower pulse pressure amplification, and higher stroke index, older age, and greater insuli...

M. Choudhary, Tuomas P. Saarinen, Matti Oivo et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.