Machine learning–based prediction of Kmax progression may aid in scheduling risk-adapted follow-up appointments, potentially leading to more rapid identification of progression-suspect KC cases.
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to use machine learning to predict 12-months progression of maximum keratometry (Kmax) within stratified repeatability limits based on a baseline topography/optical coherence tomography measurement in patients with keratoconus (KC). Methods This study included patients with diagnosed KC in which baseline and follow-up measurements were performed with a Placido disc topographer combined with optical coherence tomography (OCT) at a time interval of at least 7 months. Eyes were classified as “progressive” or “stable” based on the repeatability-adjusted difference in Kmax between the baseline measurement and a follow-up measurement. Nested cross-validation was used to train different algorithms, and the algorithm with the best area under the curve (AUC) value was used as final model. Results A total of 102 eyes of 65 patients were included. Mean age was 33.2 ± 13.0 years. Predictors with high outer fold stability included specific KC markers such as the CSIB index and posterior K values. Within the internal folds, the model achieved an AUC of 0.82, a sensitivity of 62.2%, and a specificity of 83.2% and, in the outer left-out folds, a sensitivity of 65.6%, a specificity of 84.3%, and thus an accuracy of 78.4%. Conclusions Progression of Kmax can be predicted with decent accuracy using a single OCT-based topographic measurement. Nested cross-validation represents a valuable tool in small datasets. Translational Relevance Machine learning–based prediction of Kmax progression may aid in scheduling risk-adapted follow-up appointments, potentially leading to more rapid identification of progression-suspect KC cases.
A model integrating corneal biomechanical parameters, genetic risk scores, and tear molecular biomarkers was developed to predict the risk of NTG progression and demonstrated potential clinical utility.
ML models can distinguish high-risk KC groups based on clinical risk factors, facilitating risk stratification and early lifestyle interventions and confirmed by univariable logistic regression.
Kaiyue Du, R. Peng, Yueguo Chen et al.· PLoS ONE· 0 citations
PURPOSE
To compare the predictive accuracy of standard keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation across eyes stratified by the posterior-to-anterior corneal radius ratio (PAR).
DESIGN
Retrospective evaluation of IOL power calculation accuracy.
METHODS
A total of 1,314 e...
Zhongxi Yang, Fu-man Yang, Ziqi Meng et al.· American journal of ophthalm...· 0 citations
Abnormal ectasia screening indices were common but predominantly borderline, and anterior keratometry alone could not reliably triage which corneas require tomographic examination, indicating that keratometry alone cannot replace it where it is not.
Kyo Youn Jeong, Gyuwon Ryu, Moonwon Hwang· Korean Journal of Ophthalmol...· 0 citations
The addition of corneal densitometry provided incremental improvements in discrimination and clinically meaningful risk stratification, particularly in intermediate-risk cases, particularly in intermediate-risk cases.
F. Arnalich-Montiel, Martha Stokking, N. Sáenz-Madrazo et al.· Eye and Vision· 0 citations
The MS-39 had high repeatability and reproducibility across different levels of KC severity and, given the corneal irregularity in KC, averaging three measurements may improve reliability and reduce errors in clinical decision-making.
Rui Ning, Yi-Ran Wang, Xin-Ning Yang et al.· Ophthalmic & physiological o...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.