A family of difference-informed pruning methods built upon this principle are introduced, suggesting that preserving output differences is a broadly useful and composable signal for post-training LLM sparsification.
Abstract
Pruning reduces the inference cost of large language models, but existing criteria primarily preserve large activations or reconstruct layer outputs. We argue that this overlooks a key computation performed by particularly sparsity-sensitive neurons in the MLP up and gate projections: separating similar inputs into dissimilar outputs. This suggests that effective pruning should preserve not only activations, but also the differences between outputs more broadly. We introduce a family of difference-informed pruning methods built upon this principle. Wisp is a first-order, update-free method that scores weights using input-difference norms, and Wisp+ refines this score neuronwise using the input pairs each neuron separates most strongly. Finally, Whisper is a second-order method that uses a lightly regularized difference Hessian as its reconstruction objective. Across Llama 2 and 3.1 models from 7B to 405B parameters, our second-order variant consistently improves over strong reconstruction-based baselines, while our update-free variants improve over activation-aware baselines, especially in constrained settings. The improvements over Wanda and SparseGPT extend to structured sparsity, downstream evaluations, and other model families. Augmenting stronger techniques such as RIA and ALPS with our difference-informed criteria yields further improvements, shifting the overall accuracy-runtime frontier outward at negligible additional cost. These results suggest that preserving output differences is a broadly useful and composable signal for post-training LLM sparsification.
Debias-SparseGPT is introduced, a post-training pruning method incorporating representational debiasing using a second-order term defined over demographically contrasting inputs that consistently reduces pruning-induced bias compared to SparseGPT while preserving model perplexity and zero-shot accuracy.
Irina Proskurina, Guillaume Metzler, Antoine Gourru et al.· 0 citations
A systematic study of how pruning affects SAE behavior is presented and theoretically shows that, for a fixed SAE, its impact is governed by perturbation energy, a covariance-weighted norm.
Suchit Gupte, Xue-Ru Zhang, M. Khalili· 0 citations
This work proposes extracting mechanism mounts directly from linear sites by column-tiled SVD: each mount is a triple read as trigger, write, and strength, and evaluates mounts with a pre-registered suite judged on full-write energy lift rather than tile-local lift.
The results suggest that simple pruning-inspired orderings can provide useful fixed sparse supports for PEFT, especially when combined with low-rank adapters.
Ivan D. Ilin, Philip Zmushko, Peter Richtárik· arXiv.org· 0 citations
COEC (Calibrated Orthogonal-Equivalence Compensation), a training-free compensation framework that applies alternating left and right orthogonal rotations to the retained weight, improves perplexity on every model and zero-shot accuracy in most settings over existing compensation methods.
Peiqi Yu, Nam Ling, Wei Wang et al.· 1 citation· ⚡1
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.