Skip to content
Preprint

VISTA: Auditing Semantic Divergence in Vision-Language Models

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 31 references
Computer Science

Abstract

Vision-language models can exhibit visual concept-conditioned divergence: given images containing demographic features, corporate logos, or ideological symbols, some models produce unusually uniform responses that differ from what peer models say about the same input. These behaviors evade text-only audits because visual concepts cannot be isolated or substituted the way text tokens can. We present VISTA (Visual Inconsistency Screening Through Analysis), a black-box cross-model audit that couples semantic entropy with distribution-based divergence to flag model-specific anomalies. In a controlled study, we implant concept-conditioned stances in three VLMs via fine-tuning on small biased datasets and confirm that VISTA detects them. Auditing six VLMs across 19 topics, VISTA surfaces 142 high-suspicion cases (1.2%) and identifies selective refusal as a previously unreported divergence pattern, where models refuse demographic queries at rates varying from 0 to 65% across groups.

View source

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

Which Source Wins? Task-Dependent Reliance in Vision-Language Models

Modality reliance in VLMs is not fixed, but varies across tasks, evidence structures, models, and evaluation settings, which shows that modality reliance in VLMs is not fixed, but varies across tasks, evidence structures, and evaluation settings.

Rodela Ghosh, Aviral Gupta, Guang-Jing Wang · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Seeing or Knowing? Visual Context Sensitivity in Multimodal Large Language Models

For the coarse attributes the authors study, MLLMs encode the visual evidence but cannot reliably control their reliance on it, indicating that for the coarse attributes they study, MLLMs cannot reliably control their reliance on it.

Jiaang Li, Chengzu Li, Zhaochong An et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

PragMatch: Separating Pragmatic Incongruity from Cross-Modal Mismatch in Large Vision-Language Models

The results show that LVLM predictions are sensitive to lexical, OCR-derived and stylistic cues, with injected surface signals causing substantial changes in model predictions despite unchanged underlying image-text relationships.

Zhanna Mukhametsharip, Vera Demberg, Varsha Suresh Saarland University et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

ComplexityWorld: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Verifiable Visual Decision Making

Vision-language models (VLMs) have made rapid progress in visual perception and increasingly support real-world tasks that depend on images. Many such tasks, however, require more than rec- ognizing what an image contains: a model must use visual evidence to make a complete decision whose parts jointly satisfy global c...

Ning-Xin Pan, Han-Yu Li, Ye-Hui Tang · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

TRAPSBench: Vision-Language Models Encode but Fail to Express Epistemic Restraint

When visual evidence is occluded or chaotic, models should abstain. In this paper, we show that Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can internally distinguish when abstention is required, but fail to express it anyway. We introduce TRAPSBench, a procedurally generated video benchmark of 1,404 matched physics pairs in which a...

Fnu Pramono, J. Cai, Sourabh Kulkarni · 4 citations · ⚡1

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.