Skip to content

EvoAgentBench: Benchmarking Agent Self-Evolution via Ability Transfer

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.05202 · 7 citations · ⚡ 2 influential · 32 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

EvoAgentBench is introduced, a benchmark for agent self-evolution via Ability-guided transfer across four agentic domains: web research, algorithmic reasoning, software engineering, software engineering, and knowledge work, which shifts self-evolution evaluation from aggregate accuracy comparison to fine-grained diagnosis of experience encoding, routing, and uptake.

Abstract

Agent self-evolution in long-horizon LLM systems is largely procedural: useful experience is not merely stored information, but reusable procedures for searching, debugging, and verification. Yet current evaluations do not isolate this form of transfer. Agent benchmarks test single-episode task solving; memory benchmarks target information retention rather than procedural reuse. We introduce EvoAgentBench, a benchmark for agent self-evolution via Ability-guided transfer across four agentic domains: web research, algorithmic reasoning, software engineering, and knowledge work. EvoAgentBench extracts trace-grounded Abilities from agent executions, canonicalizes them into operational units, and builds domain-specific Ability Graphs linking tasks that share procedural overlap. By design, every test task is backed by verified training-side Ability support. Across a 528/267 train/test split, two scaffolds, and three backbones, curated Ability content transfers reliably across model families, but no current automatic method sustains positive gain in all settings. EvoAgentBench shifts self-evolution evaluation from aggregate accuracy comparison to fine-grained diagnosis of experience encoding, routing, and uptake. The benchmark is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/EverMind-AI/EvoAgentBench.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

GDPevo: Evaluating Agent Self-Evolution on Real Business Tasks

GDPevo is presented, an evolution-native benchmark grounded in GDP-related enterprise workflows, together with the fully automated data pipeline that generates it, and the best evolved agents remain far below the fully informed oracle ceiling, indicating that the self-evolution ability of current agents remains far fro...

Leijun Zhou, Zhihao Liu, Xiang Qu et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

HarnessEvolve: Learning from Reference Trajectories for Reliable Agent Self-Evolution

This paper introduces HarnessEvolve, a self-evolving framework that learns from reference trajectories to achieve reliable agent self-evolution, and overcomes credit assignment failure by generating reference trajectories and aligning failed executions against them to extract error signals.

Wen Jiang, Ming-Min Chu, Yiding Tian et al. · 7 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

RedEvoAgent: Automatic Red-Teaming Agent with Experience-Driven Skill Evolution

RedEvoAgent is proposed, a black-box red-teaming agent that distills cross-case attack trajectories into a concise, human-readable attack skill that outperforms fixed and agentic baselines, improves tool efficiency, and transfers across attacker models and target execution harnesses.

Jun-Jie Zhang, Hui Liu, Ke-Cheng Chen et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

HarnessDev: Can LLMs Create and Evolve Their Own Agent Harness?

It is found that generated harnesses remain substantially behind mature human-engineered references on code and on search and research, while matching or exceeding the selected references on writing and machine-learning experimentation, with large variation in execution cost.

Yu-Hao Wu, Jing-Yuan Zhang, Jia-Jun Shi et al. · 8 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Practice Makes Unsafe: Skill Misevolution in Self-Improving LLM Agents

This work proposes SafeEvolve, which checks each skill when it is written and when a later task retrieves it, and introduces SkillMisevo-Gym, which clears every task session but keeps the skill library, so each of these steps can be checked separately.

Xutao Mao, Liang Zhao, Xiang Zheng et al. · 3 citations · ⚡1

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.