Skip to content

Beyond Detection: Agentic Attack Synthesis and Simulation for Smart Contracts

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.15673 · 0 citations · 66 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work proposes KASS (Knowledge-Augmented Attack Synthesis and Simulation), a multi-agent framework for executable smart contract exploit verification and produces structured attack plans that document exploitation flows, quantify potential asset losses, and serve as semantic false positive filters for static analysis tools.

Abstract

Smart contract vulnerabilities pose severe financial risks, yet existing security tools largely stop at vulnerability detection, offering limited support for explaining whether reported flaws are exploitable, how attacks unfold, and what concrete damage they cause. To bridge this gap, we propose KASS (Knowledge-Augmented Attack Synthesis and Simulation), a multi-agent framework for executable smart contract exploit verification. KASS decomposes automated exploit generation into planning, generation, and testing stages, and integrates three complementary mechanisms: retrieval-augmented planning over real-world audit knowledge, formal generation and validation constraints that bind attack plans to executable proof-of-concept tests, and a hierarchical dual-loop refinement process that repairs code-level errors while triggering strategy-level replanning when attack assumptions fail. We evaluate KASS on 104 SmartBugs-Curated contracts across four vulnerability categories. Experimental results show that KASS successfully generates executable exploits for 94.23% of tested contracts; this rate is higher than previously reported results for REX and AdvSCanner on comparable SmartBugs-Curated subsets, and higher than our reproduced Claude Code baseline under the same evaluation protocol. On 11 real-world CVE-tagged contracts, KASS successfully validates 9 cases. Beyond exploit generation, KASS produces structured attack plans that document exploitation flows, quantify potential asset losses, and serve as semantic false positive filters for static analysis tools.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Mutate to Bypass: Autonomous Endpoint Evasion via Knowledge-Driven Multi-Agent Orchestration

Public reports and open-source resources expose many EDR evasion techniques, but it remains unclear whether commercial Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems can withstand these documented attacks. Evaluating them requires turning fragmented security knowledge into working payloads and refining those payloads fr...

Wei Yuan, Wenbo Guo, Qing-Yun Du et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Agent Hacks Agent: Autoresearch for Production-Agent Red-Teaming

This work presents AHA, a falsifiable discovery loop that proposes a vulnerability hypothesis, constructs a falsifier, instantiates a valid attack, executes it in a sandboxed harness, reflects on the trajectory, and promotes confirmed findings into a Vulnerability Concept Graph (VCG), which provides an auditable artifa...

Xutao Mao, Xiang Zheng, Cong Wang · 3 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

CyberLLM: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Autonomous Detection and Guarded Response in Automotive Cybersecurity

CyberLLM is presented, a multi-agent, LLM-orchestrated framework that autonomously detects vulnerabilities and executes remediations under a formal, runtime safety guard, and indicates that LLM agents can perform useful autonomous cyber-defense when wrapped in a deterministic, auditable safety envelope.

Nenad Petrovic, Oussama Jeddou, Feres Ben Fraj et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

REDAgentBench: Executable Red Teaming and Faithful Measurement of LLM Agent Systems

RedAgentBench is introduced, an executable framework for autonomous red-teaming and faithful measurement that shows that executable evaluation can improve safety measurement and identify actionable intervention points.

Zixing Chen, Xingyuan Liu, Jie Zhu et al. · 3 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

ATOBench: Tracing How Autonomous Penetration-Testing Agents Verify Vulnerabilities When Target Evidence Lies

Autonomous penetration-testing agents rely on target responses. These responses guide both subsequent actions and the final report. A deceptive response can therefore redirect both the attack trajectory and the agent's verification process. However, final reports reveal little about how an agent interprets conflicting...

Qi-Yang Chen, Yixi Li, Feng-Wei Zhang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.