Cross-modal patch-level embeddings can support behavioral triage against author impersonation in real-world repositories, indicating that cross-modal patch-level embeddings can support behavioral triage against author impersonation in real-world repositories.
Abstract
Software supply-chain attacks increasingly exploit an identity gap where compromised maintainer accounts authorize malicious changes. This work evaluates patch-level authorship verification as a behavioral defense layer, showing that stylometric analysis can operate not only on full source files but also on patch-level commits. We fine-tune a cross-modal transformer on more than 20 years of Linux kernel commit history to embed code diffs and commit messages into a unified stylometric space, achieving ROC AUC of 0.93 for open-world authorship verification. We then use these representations in a streaming anomaly detector suited to continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) settings. We validate the pipeline on two retrospective supply-chain incidents involving different patch characteristics: the 2021 PHP backdoor and the 2026 ForceMemo/GlassWorm campaign. Without retraining, the proposed detector surfaces both PHP forged commits within approximately 1% of the maintainer audit queue and ranks the 28 scoreable ForceMemo spoofs with a median per-repository review burden of 0.8%. These results indicate that cross-modal patch-level embeddings can support behavioral triage against author impersonation in real-world repositories.
GitHub is one of the largest open-source software (OSS) communities for development and collaboration. Impersonation maliciously assuming another user's identity to access code, sway projects, or spread misinformation—has driven recent real-world attacks and is an escalating concern. We present the first exploration of...
Yueke Zhang, Yifan Zhang, Pamela J. Wisniewski et al.· ACM Transactions on Software...· 0 citations
This work presents Porting Benchmark, a curated dataset of 1,234 security patch backporting cases spanning cross-version, cross-branch, and cross-repository scenarios, paired with a common evaluation framework and identifies four root-cause categories (missing target API awareness, cross-version semantic mismatch, non-...
Jin-Cheng Yang, Yu-Long Fu, Cheng-Wei Liu et al.· Proceedings of the 41st IEEE...· 1 citation
The results show that access to repository history is insufficient: concealment becomes most effective when benign and malicious changes jointly occupy the auditor's active review context or when the stated purpose plausibly accounts for the attack-bearing diff.
TrustShiftProbe is introduced, an evaluation and defense framework with four contributions: a stateful temporal threat model of the agent-server lifecycle as a benign conditioning phase followed by an adversarial defection at a trust horizon, and a language-agnostic attack engine that instantiates each variant as a com...
Mehrdad Rostamzadeh, Sidhant Narula, Mohammad GhasemiGol et al.· 1 citation
SecDrift, a benchmark measuring sector-conditioned security drift, is presented: the change in static-analysis vulnerability rates when prompts are conditioned on industry contexts versus neutral baselines and model selection has a large and consistent effect.
This paper does an audit of defense mechanisms under jailbreak attacks on locally deployed models by tracing each failure back to the specific assumption it relies on.