2026· International journal of advanced engineering and management research· Vol 11, pp. 439-459· 0 citations· 39 references
TL;DR
The model emphasizes the critical need for established governance before technical implementation and the importance of human-in-the-loop management for highrisk workflows, including the mitigation of probabilistic decisionmaking impacts such as bias, misinformation, and privacy violations.
Abstract
Academic research on securing Large Language Models (LLMs) in cybersecurity currently
exists in silos. To address this fragmentation, this study develops the 'Holistic Deployment Risk
Model' (HDRM) through a qualitative thematic synthesis of nine 'cornerstone' articles, selected
through purposive sampling to ensure a representative cross-section of technical, ethical, and
organizational perspectives, consolidating technical vulnerabilities, autonomous agentic risks,
and adversarial misuse with organizational governance and human elements to identify critical
'blind spots'. The model clusters associated risks into five holistic, interdependent layers -
Governance, Data and Privacy, Model Behavior, Operational Security, and Integrations and
Infrastructure - while illustrating how vulnerabilities can propagate across these interdependent
layers. To help demonstrate concrete applicability for regulatory readiness and real-world uses,
components of the model are qualitatively mapped to current AI risk management frameworks:
NIST AI RMF 1.0 and ISO/IEC 23894. While the model is currently theoretical and requires
further investigation to confirm its efficacy, it offers organizations an actionable checklist to
approach secure LLM deployment. It emphasizes the critical need for established governance
before technical implementation and the importance of human-in-the-loop management for highrisk workflows. Ultimately, the work highlights key areas of 'ethical security' necessary to
responsibly develop and manage AI systems, including the mitigation of probabilistic decisionmaking impacts such as bias, misinformation, and privacy violations.
A modular framework that evaluates each model through three orthogonal pipelines under a unified protocol, aggregating results into a standardized dangerous-capability profile $\phi$, showing that scaling and alignment progress do not uniformly translate into safety.
Zheng-Yi Jin, Ru Zhang, Xiao Chen et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces MORPHEUS, a holistic framework conceptualizing human-centric security as a dynamic, interconnected system and reveals how cognitive, affective, and behavioral processes jointly shape security outcomes, distilling them into 12 recurring interaction mechanisms.
Giuseppe Desolda, Francesco Greco, R. Lanzilotti et al.· ACM Transactions on Computer...· 3 citations
The findings show that LLMs can approximate structured cybersecurity reasoning under controlled representations, but do not apply it robustly, which has important implications for the design and evaluation of AI-assisted security decision-support systems.
A multi-level cybersecurity and privacy framework that integrates complementary controls across physical, network, endpoint, application, data, identity and access management, monitoring and incident response, and human and policy domains is developed.
This study presents a PRISMA-ScR-guided scoping review to systematically map the current landscape of LLM applications in cybersecurity, addressing their roles as both threat enablers and defensive tools while identifying key governance challenges and future research directions.