Aug 2026· International Conference on Cyber Security And Protection Of Digital Services· 0 citations
TL;DR
This paper proposes a five-layer defence-in-depth framework encompassing input validation, identity and least privilege, runtime sandboxing, human-in-the-loop governance, and continuous behavioural monitoring, and identifies sandboxing and least-privilege enforcement as the highest return on investment controls.
Abstract
The rapid enterprise adoption of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) has introduced a category of security risk that existing cyber security frameworks were not designed to address. With 78 per cent of Fortune 500 companies projected to deploy agentic AI by 2026 and the global market expected to reach US$89.6bn, the attack surface created by these autonomous workflows demands urgent attention from security practitioners. This paper examines the distinct threat model presented by agentic AI, drawing on recent high-profile incidents, including the weaponisation of a large language model in a state-sponsored espionage campaign affecting 30 organisations and the compromise of an open-source agent framework exposing 30,000 Internet-facing instances, to illustrate the consequences of inadequate controls. Grounded in the Open Worldwide Application Security Project’s Top 10 for Agentic Applications (2026) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s ongoing agentic AI security initiative, the paper proposes a five-layer defence-in-depth framework encompassing input validation, identity and least privilege, runtime sandboxing, human-in-the-loop governance, and continuous behavioural monitoring. It identifies sandboxing and least-privilege enforcement as the highest return on investment controls, provides a prioritised implementation roadmap, and discusses the emerging paradigm of cryptographic workflow authentication. The analysis concludes that organisations treating agentic AI security as an extension of traditional application security will find themselves critically exposed and that a purpose-built security architecture is now a business imperative. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.
In today’s evolving digital landscape, a new kind of AI has emerged: agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems. These are not just tools but intelligent entities that act on their own, make decisions, and carry out tasks proactively. Once placed inside containerised cloud environments such as Kubernetes, however, th...
Advait Patel, Vaishnavi Gudur, Charit Upadhyay et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
This article bridges three literatures developed in isolation, Industry 5.0 cybersecurity, agentic AI security, and Industry 5.0’s own foundational scholarship, proposing a six-category threat taxonomy and a paired forensic readiness framework, formalised as a five-level maturity model and grounded in real 2024–2026 in...
Maurice E. Dawson, A. B. Ben Ayed, Samson Quaye· Information· 0 citations
CyberAgent is a theoretical design-science artefact that has neither been implemented nor empirically evaluated, and could make enterprise-grade cyber defence more accessible to mid-market organisations that cannot afford 24/7 SOC analyst staffing, by substantially reducing the alert-triage workload.
S. Meeampol, Narongsak Sukma· Interdisciplinary Journal of...· 0 citations
A solid machine-readable base has been created for enterprise-wide management of autonomous AI systems by performing this evaluation in a methodical manner, a solid machine-readable base has been created for enterprise-wide management of autonomous AI systems.
This paper organizes the area into a structured taxonomy along five axes: the de-tection capability targeted, the analysis paradigm employed, the agent archi-tecture, the degree of autonomy, and the evaluation methodology.
Andi Xia· Poster Volume 0008 The 2026...· 0 citations
A security framework for MCP-based multi-agent SOC pipelines, implemented as a middleware layer comprising a tool registration validator and five execution layers: access control, rate limiting, input validation, output validation, and audit logging, indicates that systematic middleware controls can secure MCP-based ag...
Rodrigo Tavares de Pina Simões, Xavier Larriva-Novo, Carmen Sánchez-Zas et al.· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.