Skip to content
Preprint

Teaching MLLMs to Say No: Generalized Referring Expression Comprehension via Refusal Calibrated GRPO

Aug 2026 · 1 citation · 38 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Refusal-Calibrated Group Relative Policy Optimization (RC-GRPO) is proposed, a calibrated RL strategy that strengthens the refusal ability of MLLMs while preserving localization performance, and enforces"None" outputs in rollouts for valid advantage estimation on negative samples and applies a penalty to prevent over-refusal on positives, achieving a balanced trade-off between accuracy and reliability.

Abstract

We tackle the challenging yet underexplored task of Generalized Referring Expression Comprehension (GREC), which requires a model to localize the object described by a textual expression when it exists (positive sample) and to refuse output when it does not (negative sample). Although Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel at localizing existing objects, they often fail to reject nonexistent ones due to the absence of negative samples during training, producing hallucinated bounding boxes. Existing post-training approaches such as supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) enhance refusal behavior but usually degrade localization accuracy on positive samples, undermining the model's core competence. To address this, we propose Refusal-Calibrated Group Relative Policy Optimization (RC-GRPO), a calibrated RL strategy that strengthens the refusal ability of MLLMs while preserving localization performance. It enforces"None"outputs in rollouts for valid advantage estimation on negative samples and applies a penalty to prevent over-refusal on positives, achieving a balanced trade-off between accuracy and reliability. A second-stage reasoning reinforcement further consolidates causal understanding and interpretability. Experiments on three GREC benchmarks demonstrate that RC-GRPO attains superior localization accuracy while maintaining strong refusal capability.

View source

Similar papers

Book Open access Jul 2026

Reward Shaping for Robust Refusal in Small Language Models for Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering

It is shown that instruction-tuned models generate answers even when explicitly prompted to refuse when the answer is not supported by the documents, and Reward Shaping for Refusal and Reasoning (RSRR), a reinforcement learning framework that teaches LMs to reason step-by-step over multiple documents, is introduced.

Thilina C. Rajapakse, M. de Rijke · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

When the API Speaks the Wrong Language: Revisiting Post-Training for Multilingual Tool Use

It is found that, in this benchmark, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) provides a strong baseline, substantially improving argument language consistency and end-to-end function call accuracy and, under consistent model selection, SFT achieves performance comparable to, and sometimes exceeding more complex reinforcement lear...

Siddharth Chauhan, Thomas Butler, Abhishek Singhania et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

DKL: Decoupled Knowledge Learning for Instruction-Tuned Language Models

RAG has become the de facto method for incorporating new, corpus-specific knowledge into an instruction following LLM (Instruct LLM). Although RAG-based prompting improves factual grounding, it fails when retrieval is incorrect or incomplete, leading to hallucinations. Finetuning methods such as RAFT and PA-RAG enhance...

Kushagra Bhushan, Meghanadh Pulivarthi, Sai Krishna Reddy Sathi et al. · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

HalluPrism: When Multimodal Uncertainty Should Diagnose, Not Decide

HalluPrism, a behavioral diagnostic that re-runs an answer after visual degradation, blank-image replacement, and grounding or relation checks is proposed, a behavioral diagnostic that separates failure diagnosis from abstention scoring.

A. Prakash, Sourish Dasgupta, Tanmoy Chakraborty · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.