Skip to content
Preprint

Refusing Intent, Not Form: Wrapper-Based Intent-Group Supervision for LLM Safety

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 42 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work proposes Wrapper-Based Intent-Form Augmentation (WIFA), an automatic intent-group augmentation method that pairs wrapped harmful examples with structurally matched wrapped benign counterexamples, requiring no external teacher or manual per-wrapper intent labels.

Abstract

Safety tuning can improve harmful refusal, but models may learn surface-form shortcuts: wrapped harmful prompts bypass safety, while similarly wrapped benign prompts are over-refused. We propose Wrapper-Based Intent-Form Augmentation (WIFA), an automatic intent-group augmentation method that pairs wrapped harmful examples with structurally matched wrapped benign counterexamples, requiring no external teacher or manual per-wrapper intent labels. We use WIFA as a common data layer for two complementary fine-tuning routes: WIFA-Boost, a two-stage high-safety recipe, and Anchored Group-Consistent Refusal Training (A-GCRT), which regularizes refusal/compliance decision scores across same-intent wrappers and anchors harmful and benign groups on opposite sides of a margin. In the Qwen setting, WIFA-Boost reaches the strongest transformed-harmful refusal, while A-GCRT reduces OR-Bench over-refusal from 25.7\% for the base model to 17.4\%; reproduced baselines do not match these operating points. Llama results and ablations over data structure, two-stage order, and A-GCRT components support this intent-group interpretation without claiming universal below-base over-refusal.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

When Refusal Looks Safe: The Refusal-Cue Shortcut in Safety Guard Models

To mitigate the refusal-cue shortcut, sparse complementary masking is adapted as a lightweight post-hoc intervention that identifies and suppresses a small set of shortcut-associated attention heads and MLP neurons without retraining and achieves an approximately 79% relative reduction in response-initial detection fai...

Yu Feng, Chun-Ting Zang, Chen Shen et al. · 1 citation
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Beyond Shallow Alignment: How Post-Training Methods Determine Refusal Circuits And Steering Robustness

No post-training method achieves all three properties the authors would want from safe alignment at once: refusal that isn't concentrated in a few fragile components, safety gains that don't cost general capability, and safety behavior correctable through small, targeted edits.

Hoang Cuong Nguyen, M. Dras, Usman Naseem · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

HiRoute: Hierarchical Routed Prompt Tuning for Safety Alignment of Large Language Models

Experiments across three instruction-tuned models show that HiRoute achieves high safety rates across multiple safety benchmarks while preserving safe-response helpfulness, reducing over-refusal, and maintaining competitive performance on general-purpose tasks.

Fang-Zhou Chen, Shiji Zhao, Mengyan Wang et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Refusal is Not Safety! Benchmarking Latent Safety Risks of LLM-Driven Content Humorization

An exploratory study involving over 30,000 real-world agent interaction records and 45 stand-up comedians reveals practical safety concerns in LLM-based content humorization, and proposes a prompt injection attack that exploits latent risks in humor-based defenses.

Yu Cui, Ruiqing Yue, Tingyu Li et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.