Skip to content
Open access

Artificial Intelligence and the Rise of Digital Empathy: Transforming Well-Being in Modern Workplaces

2026 · International Journal of Management Studies and Social Science Research · 0 citations · 24 references

TL;DR

It is argued that digital empathy is best conceptualised as a relational interface that complements—rather than replaces—human connection that complements—rather than replaces—human connection.

Abstract

This paper examines the evolving role of artificial intelligence (AI) in supporting employee well-being through mechanisms of digital empathy. Drawing on qualitative case studies of two global organisations deploying AI-based emotional support systems, the research investigates how employees interpret and interact with these technologies. The study is guided by three core questions: How is empathy simulated through AI in workplace settings? How do employees perceive and experience these systems? What ethical and relational dynamics shape their implementation and impact? A qualitative multi-case design was adopted, utilising semi-structured interviews with HR professionals and end users (n=22) and document analysis of platform architecture and language models. Findings reveal that while AI systems can provide emotionally responsive feedback, users remain ambivalent about their authenticity and ethical use. Participants valued the immediacy and privacy of AI-based tools but highlighted limitations in nuance, trust, and cultural fit. Drawing on emotional labour theory and self-determination theory, the paper argues that digital empathy is best conceptualised as a relational interface that complements—rather than replaces—human connection. Organisations must embed these tools within cultures of psychological safety and ethical transparency. The study recommends participatory co-design of well-being technologies and hybrid models of care that preserve emotional authenticity. These insights contribute to emerging debates on AI, care work, and the transformation of human resource management in the algorithmic age.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

AI-Augmented Leadership and Employee Voice Behaviour: Exploring the Roles of Trust and Empowerment

As organisations increasingly embed artificial intelligence (AI) into the routines of leadership, from predictive performance dashboards to AI-assisted feedback and coaching tools, a pressing but underexamined question is how this technological augmentation of leadership shapes employees' willingness to speak up. This...

K. I. Amadi · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

From Substitution to Scaffolding: Breaking the Self-Reinforcing Harm Cycle of AI in Education (and Beyond)

An integrative framework of four interrelated dimensions -cognition, agency, emotional well-being, and ethics- linked by a self-reinforcing cycle where cognitive offloading reduces effort, weakens agency, and compounds emotional and ethical harm is organized.

Lucile Favero, J. A. Pérez-Ortiz, Tanja Käser et al. · 0 citations
2026

Perceived Emotional Authenticity in AI Chatbots vs. Human Support: A Teen Interpretation of Empathy and Trust

This study examines how adolescents perceive emotional support from human and AI therapists in a therapeutic context and recommends an ethical hybrid framework that integrates AI into therapeutic support while preserving human oversight for more nuanced aspects of care.

Swara Honagudi · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Reimagining Opportunities: Exploring the Role of Emotional and Artificial Intelligence Shaping Future Workforce: Insights from Tanzania’s Public Sectors Organisations

This study examines the influence of emotional and artificial intelligence in Tanzania’s public sector in the era defined by rapid digital transformation and increasing complexity in service delivery, the synergy between human centered skills and technological innovation has become important. This research adopted a qu...

Juma H. Uledi · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Assembling Engagement With Autonomy and Language ‐ A Neuroscientific Case Study With Digital Companions

Results show that greater user autonomy and participatory linguistic styles significantly enhance engagement, whereas authoritative language reduces it, emphasizing the importance of designing DCs that empower users and create authentic connections.

Aitor Ezker‐Galech, Raquel Chocarro, Mónica Cortiñas et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.