Skip to content
Open access

LCFND: OT–guided LLM evidence reasoning and graph verification for multimodal fake news detection

Aug 2026 · Journal of King Saud University: Computer and Information Sciences · Vol 38 · 0 citations · 45 references

TL;DR

LCFND, a staged and fully specified bounded-evidence verification pipeline for localized conflict discovery, structured evidence generation, and graph-based verification, is presented, better suited to offline or high-risk verification than to large-scale real-time screening.

Abstract

Multimodal fake news is difficult to detect when text and image remain topically aligned but diverge in local factual details such as entities, locations, time, or event attributes. Existing methods often rely on global cross-modal fusion and may therefore overlook these localized contradictions. We present LCFND, a staged and fully specified bounded-evidence verification pipeline for localized conflict discovery, structured evidence generation, and graph-based verification. Optimal transport identifies high-conflict token-region pairs and constructs localized evidence packets. A parameter-efficient LLM trained with OT-grounded structured targets and training-split label-informed weak relation calibration then converts these packets into structured evidence, including claims, visual evidence, contradiction types, and grounded rationales. A heterogeneous evidence graph integrates OT conflict priors and LLM-generated evidence for veracity prediction, and all graph-construction rules, training objectives, and evaluation protocols are stated explicitly for reproducibility. Under a controlled matched-backbone protocol on Weibo, Twitter, and GossipCop, LCFND improves F1 over the top matched-backbone baseline MGCA by 1.47, 1.73, and 1.67 points, respectively. The gain remains positive when the visual backbone is strengthened to ViT-B/16 or Swin-T. Manual evidence evaluation on 500 samples per dataset reports 85.9–87.3% claim grounding and 78.1–80.2% contradiction-type correctness. Under the P3b matched-input protocol, LCFND remains above FND-LLM-M and MMRGV-lite, and improves average cross-dataset transfer F1 from 67.10 to 69.98. Full online inference takes 1.47 s per sample in our setting, so the framework is better suited to offline or high-risk verification than to large-scale real-time screening.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Jul 2026

CAER: Conflict-Aware Evidence Routing with Dual Prefix Experts for Multimodal Large Language Models

CAER introduces a span-grounded evidence router that transforms claim representations into soft textual queries and retrieves corresponding evidence from frozen visual tokens, enabling fine-grained conflict estimation and design a dual-prefix expert routing mechanism that learns separate experts for visually supported...

Zi-Xuan Liu, Juntao Cai, Xiaoxu Cai et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

KGEMD: knowledge-guided enhanced multimodal detection for fake news

The results indicate that explicitly modeling semantic conflict as a discriminative feature effectively improves detection precision and generalization, providing a robust solution for factual verification in complex media environments.

Zi-Heng Wang, Jun-Fang Song, Shu-Yu Wang et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

HyperClaim: Fine-Grained Cross-Modal Hypergraph Reasoning for Video Misinformation Detection

This work proposes HyperClaim, a discriminative temporal hypergraph framework for sample-level authenticity classification, which preserves fine-grained cross-modal and temporal structure that global fusion tends to flatten.

Xiang-Bo Wang, Jiasheng Zhang, Xing-Tong Yu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Beyond Blind Compliance: Benchmarking Task Verification in OCR Reasoning

VeriOCRBench, a 1,800-sample human-verified benchmark built from source images drawn from 8 OCR-related datasets and spanning 8 real-world image domains, with controlled, image-grounded diagnostic tasks, is introduced, exposing a critical reliability gap in current OCR reasoning systems.

Yue Zhou, Yuan Wu, Yi Chang · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

OCR-MetaReasoning Benchmark: Evaluating the Meta-Reasoning Ability of MLLMs in Text-Rich Image Understanding

Experiments with representative closed-source and open-source MLLMs show that OCR-grounded meta-reasoning remains far from saturated: models struggle with visible-rule application and layout-sensitive inference, while process-compliant rationales can accompany incorrect final answers under exact-match evaluation.

Geng-Xu Li, Yuan Wu, Yi Chang · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.