Skip to content
Open access

Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives on Immersive Virtual Reality for Rehabilitation and Patient Engagement in a Post-Acute Community Setting: A Qualitative Descriptive Study

Sep 2026 · Technologies · 0 citations · 26 references

Abstract

Background: Immersive virtual reality (VR) may support rehabilitation and patient engagement; however, little is known about how frontline healthcare professionals perceive its clinical relevance and feasibility in post-acute community care settings. This study explored healthcare professionals’ perceptions of the potential clinical uses, usability, and implementation requirements of patient-facing immersive VR in a community hospital providing post-acute care in Singapore. Methods: Using purposive sampling, nineteen healthcare professionals from a subacute hospital in Singapore participated in individual semi-structured interviews. Participants discussed their expectations of VR, experienced approximately 10–15 min of a reminiscence-oriented virtual tour of a local (now defunct) village, using an Oculus Quest head-mounted display, and subsequently reflected on its usability and potential applications. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 informed the interview guide and was used as a sensitising framework. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using hybrid deductive–inductive framework analysis. Results: Four themes were identified: (1) clinical value was conditional on therapeutic relevance; (2) anticipated patient acceptability depended on person–content fit and social context; (3) simple navigation did not remove physical and sensory barriers; and (4) clinical integration required a supporting service model. Conclusions: Healthcare professionals viewed immersive VR as potentially useful but not yet ready for routine clinical implementation. Adoption in post-acute care should be guided by therapeutic purpose, accessibility, and integration into existing workflows rather than technological novelty alone. Future research and development should prioritise co-designed therapeutic content, patient selection, accessibility, workflow integration, and implementation support.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.