Jul 2026· AIware· pp. 380-387· 2 citations· 18 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
AgentTelemetry, an open-source benchmark suite and toolkit for evaluating fault detection in agent systems, and an ablation study proves all nine span kinds are necessary: removing any one makes at least one fault type undetectable.
Abstract
LLM-based autonomous agents fail in ways that existing observability infrastructure cannot detect. OpenTelemetry’s GenAI semantic conventions cover LLM invocation and tool execution but leave five critical agent orchestration phases—planning, reasoning, safety monitoring, inter-agent delegation, and memory management—without span-level representation. We present AgentTelemetry, an open-source benchmark suite and toolkit for evaluating fault detection in agent systems. The benchmark defines (1) a taxonomy of 14 fault types mapped to 9 agent-specific span kinds, (2) a controlled evaluation harness of 490 fault-detection cells (14 faults × 5 observability conditions × 7 frameworks; enumerated as 2,940 raw configurations across 6 mock-LLM seeds), and (3) a pip-installable library (3,700+ LOC, 78 tests) with adapters for seven frameworks. On the controlled benchmark, the full span taxonomy achieves a Fault Detection Rate (FDR) of 1.000—an upper bound confirming structural completeness—compared to 0.429 for vanilla OpenTelemetry and OTel+GenAI. An ablation study proves all nine span kinds are necessary: removing any one makes at least one fault type undetectable. A case study on 112 SWE-bench Lite instances reveals that 84/112 agent runs (75%) exhausted the 8-iteration limit and are classified as reasoning loops by structural pattern (a definitional partition of the failed-trace population, not a sampling estimate)—a failure mode invisible to vanilla OTel—and a telemetry-guided intervention improves the patch rate by +12.5 pp over a matched control (Fisher’s exact p=0.53, two-sided; demonstrative not statistically significant at n=24). All code, data, and benchmark configurations are open-source for reproducibility.
DeepDebug achieves the best strict attribution accuracy among the evaluated methods on both tested open-weight backbones, reaching 28.8 percent exact agent-and-step accuracy on qwen3.5-9b versus 21.7 percent for the strongest single-pass baseline.
Kunlun Zhu, Xuyan Ye, Zhi-Guang Han et al.· arXiv.org· 3 citations
AGENTCHAOSBENCH is presented, a benchmark for detecting and localizing runtime faults in agentic systems from their execution telemetry, and its held-out labels and compact prediction format support reproducible comparison of LLM-based and non-LLM diagnosis methods.
Chenkai Zhang, Yiran Li, Yifang Tian et al.· 0 citations
RedAgentBench is introduced, an executable framework for autonomous red-teaming and faithful measurement that shows that executable evaluation can improve safety measurement and identify actionable intervention points.
Zixing Chen, Xingyuan Liu, Jie Zhu et al.· 3 citations
Multi-agent systems built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for complex tasks requiring autonomous planning, tool use, and inter-agent coordination. However, the non-deterministic nature of LLM outputs and the emergent behavior arising from agent interactions render traditional test oracles inef...
Gopalakrishnan Marimuthu· International Conference on...· 0 citations
Existing evaluation frameworks mostly assess only one part of AI agents, such as task completion (AgentBench) or security robustness (AgentDojo, ASB), rather than the complete pipeline of planning, tool selection, tool execution, memory and reasoning. Failures can occur at any stage, yet existing benchmarks rarely iden...
S. Nag, Sachita, Abhishek Kumar Singh et al.· 0 citations
NetConfArena is presented, an executable benchmark for evaluating LLM agents in closed-loop network configuration, and its findings suggest two future directions: using validated trajectories as supervision signals to improve foundation models, and designing harness mechanisms that make agent execution more reliable an...
Chang Liu, Xiao-Hui Xie, Xinyi Chen et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.