Skip to content
#small language model Open access

Фактори продуктивності YOLO11 у реальному часі на Raspberry Pi 5 за обмеженого бюджету ресурсів: протокол даних і ключові результати

Oct 2026 · Kyiv Academic University
Advanced Neural Network Applications

Abstract

An object detector for small smart cameras and mobile robots must fit within the resources of an onboard computer that it shares with other tasks. On a Raspberry Pi 5 with a budget of two inference threads, we study how the frame rate, latency, accuracy and heating of the YOLO11n detector are affected by the following factors: model format and numerical precision, input resolution, pipeline implementation language, and the Hailo-8L neural processing unit. Particular attention is paid to the data protocol. It covers forming the COCO val2017 test subset and the calibration set, aligning ground-truth annotations with detection outputs, and evaluating accuracy on small objects. A fully integer INT8 model in TensorFlow Lite with a C++ pipeline runs 3.6 times faster than the baseline Python implementation with ONNX Runtime in FP32 (17.4 vs. 4.8 fps), at a cost of 4.3 pp in mAP50–95. A 320 × 320 input gives a further 4.1-fold speedup, but mAP_S drops to 3.7 %. This drop is explained by small objects being downscaled to sizes comparable to the stride of the finest feature map. The Hailo-8L delivers 65.6 fps at 640 × 640, keeps mAP_S at the FP32 level and does not load the CPU.

View source

Similar papers

#small language model Dataset Open access Oct 2026

Socratic guiding questions in synthetic arithmetic data: matched LoRA runs (revision v2)

Supporting data, adapters, predictions and code for the article *Low-Cost LoRA Fine-Tuning of Small Language Models for Multi-Step Arithmetic Reasoning* by Jake O'Grady, Asena Isik Gürhan, Chee Fong Ting and Effirul Ramlan (University of Galway). We generated 20,000 GSM8K-derived arithmetic problems with step-by-step s...

O'Grady, Jake, Gürhan, Asena Isik, Chee, Fong Ting et al. · 465 citations
#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#computer vision Review Open access May 2015

A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services

The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.

Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al. · 111 citations · ⚡8
#computer vision Open access Feb 2018

Lean Internal Startups for Software Product Innovation in Large Companies: Enablers and Inhibitors

This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.

Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 78 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.