Jul 2026· Applied and Computational Engineering· 0 citations
TL;DR
This review provides systematic theoretical support for industrial RAG model selection and optimization and summarizes existing research gaps, including lightweight deployment and multimodal expansion, and proposes future research directions for trustworthy RAG systems.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) suffer inherent factual hallucination defects, which block their deployment in high-risk fields such as medicine and finance. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) serves a mainstream hallucination mitigation solution by introducing traceable external knowledge evidence. Nevertheless, existing RAG variants are plagued by retrieval noise, poor domain generalization, lack of reasoning verification and inconsistent evaluation standards. This paper adopts classification and comparative analysis as core research methods, and systematically sorts out all hallucination suppression technical routes centered on mitigating LLM hallucinations. Four major categories of anti-hallucination RAG technologies are summarized and their applicable boundaries are compared; two mainstream evaluation benchmarks, CRAG and RAGEval, are thoroughly analyzed. Aggregated experimental results demonstrate that layered stacking of multiple technologies achieves optimal hallucination reduction performance. Finally, this paper summarizes existing research gaps, including lightweight deployment and multimodal expansion, and proposes future research directions for trustworthy RAG systems. This review provides systematic theoretical support for industrial RAG model selection and optimization.
This study proposes a novel conceptual framework and taxonomy for hallucination mitigation in low-code AI environments, integrating retrieval, validation, conflict resolution, and workflow orchestration mechanisms to contribute to the development of more reliable, transparent, and scalable AI systems.
I. K. W. Adnyana, Rosalin Theophilia Tayane, Fahmi Fahmi et al.· EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan d...· 0 citations
This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of hallucinations in GAI and LLMs, and synthesizes a range of correction and mitigation techniques, from proactive measures during training to hybrid approaches that combine detection and intervention.
M. Naser· Language Resources and Evalu...· 0 citations
By unifying four hallucination dimensions with paired question design, KnowHal addresses an important gap in existing evaluation frameworks and enables a more comprehensive assessment of hallucinations in MLLMs.
Ruihan Li, Jiyang Tan, Kailin Jiang et al.· 0 citations
This survey provides a comprehensive treatment of the field across five interconnected dimensions, proposing a unified five-class taxonomy that organizes hallucinations by their failure mode: object, attribute, relational, factual, factual, and reasoning.
A. O. Ogar, Joshua Abah, M. Suleiman et al.· 0 citations
Faithfulness hallucinations, where large language models generate outputs unsupported by retrieved evidence, remain a central challenge for trustworthy AI. We present a systematic empirical evaluation of faithfulness in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems using two benchmark datasets, HotpotQA and HaluBench, covering both multi-hop reasoning and single-hop hallucination detection. We analyze three small-to-mid-sized (2B-8B) open-weight LLMs in combination with multiple retrieval strategies, including sparse, dense, and hybrid approaches, as well as score-based and rank-based fusion techniques, enabling a comprehensive assessment of retrieval-generation interactions. By disentangling retrieval and generation errors, we characterize how different pipeline components contribute to hallucinations in RAG systems. Our analysis provides actionable insights and practical evaluation protocols, highlighting the critical role of robust retrieval and careful system design. These findings offer a benchmarking-oriented perspective for developing more reliable and faithful RAG systems within evaluated model scales.
C. Mala, Gizem Gezici, Fosca Giannotti· Machine-mediated learning· 0 citations
A concise two-axis framework that integrates an “intrinsic-extrinsic” distinction in source attribution introduced by Ji et al. with a “faithfulness-factuality” distinction in contextual grounding surveyed is presented, yielding four clearly defined hallucination types applicable across tasks, modalities and architectures.
Misbah Khan, Preston Billion-Polak, T. Khoshgoftaar· IEEE Access· 0 citations