Skip to content
#reinforcement learning Book Open access

Co-Designing TWT Scheduling and RF Energy Harvesting for Sustainable Heterogeneous Wi-Fi: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach

Oct 2026 · Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Mobility in the Evolving Internet Architecture · 0 citations · 5 references
Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks

Abstract

IEEE 802.11ax Target Wake Time (TWT) coordinates station sleep and wake schedules for power savings, while RF energy harvesting promises battery-free operation for IoT sensors. Though studied in isolation, the two are coupled; the same access point (AP) that schedules TWT service periods, controls the RF harvest of battery-free stations. We present, to our knowledge, the first framework to co-design them. It features (i) a standard-compliant, datasheet-fidelity ns-3 model of off-the-shelf PowerCast P21XXCSR hardware; and (ii) a deep reinforcement learning scheduler that jointly sets the TWT schedule, the station-to-group assignment, and a novel Power Delivery Window (PDW) that transmits RF energy to sleeping harvesters. The AP is blind to device class and uses only protocol-compliant signals to ensure deployability. Because the PDW reward is delayed through stored charge, an asymmetric critic sees the oracle energy state only during training, while the recurrent, &agr;-fair actor stays realistic. Against a principled online M/D/1 scheduler, while reclaiming slightly less harvested energy, our proposed scheduler consumes 1.9× less and serves 2.8× more harvester demand per joule, raising fairness (+0.11 Jain) and winning the &agr;-fair welfare in 89% of scenarios.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.