Skip to content
#explainable ai #edge computing Review Open access

A comprehensive review of AI-driven water-quality monitoring and prediction: advances, challenges, and future directions

Oct 2026 · Frontiers in Water · 0 citations · 96 references
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies

Abstract

Water quality has emerged as a critical global concern that requires advanced monitoring and management strategies. Traditional water-quality assessment methods predominantly rely on laboratory-oriented analysis that are time consuming, expensive, and are often labor-intensive. This study presents a thorough overview of the paradigm shift from conventional lab analysis towards intelligent and automated, AI-based assessment and monitoring frameworks. The survey systematically explains the use of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and hybrid models to analyze complicated multidimensional and nonlinear water parameters. This study evaluates predictive architectures ranging from traditional regression-based models to advanced ensembles and deep neural networks (CNNs, ANNs, and RNNs) integrated with IoT computing technologies for continuous water quality monitoring. Enhancing models’ interpretability and transparency through Explainable Artificial Intelligence methods like SHAP and LIME are analyzed. This survey addresses existing challenges like data scarcity, interpretability of the model, and computational complexity. Self-attention-based architectures, generative AI, and edge computing used to improve the robustness of future water-quality management systems are also assessed. An overall structured research perspective on AI-driven water-quality assessment with methodological gaps with future scope are established in this survey.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 15, 2026

AI model decodes the language cells use to communicate

A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.