Multimodal vision-language systems typically fuse image and text embeddings through classical operators such as concatenation, attention, bilinear pooling, or tensor interactions. We propose Quantum Entangled Multimodal Fusion Networks (QEMFN), a hybrid quantum-classical framework that introduces parameterized entanglement as a structured inductive bias for multimodal fusion. Pretrained visual and textual features are projected into compact latent spaces, encoded as angle-parameterized quantum states, processed through intra-modal and paired cross-modal entangling circuits, and measured to produce fused representations for retrieval. Under matched parameter budgets and identical frozen CLIP backbones, QEMFN outperforms classical fusion baselines on COCO-5k and Flickr30k, including multilayer perceptron, tensor fusion, FiLM, cross-attention, compact transformer, and a dequantized paired-topology analogue. An ablation suite isolates the quantum module's contribution from the surrounding classical projections, and quantum-centric analyses report Meyer-Wallach entangling capability, expressibility, gradient variance against barren-plateau bounds, and entropy-performance correlation under controls for training progress alongside an intervention study on the entangling component. QEMFN is executed under shot-based estimation, a noise-modeled fake backend, and a real superconducting device with zero-noise extrapolation. This work does not claim quantum computational advantage; the contribution is the framework together with a controlled empirical and quantum-centric evaluation that positions trainable entanglement as an interpretable, hardware-executable fusion mechanism at scales accessible on contemporary devices.
This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.
F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al.· 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on...· 1,069 citations· ⚡112
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.