Sep 2026· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence· 0 citations· 29 references
TL;DR
Lucyde is introduced, a web-based demonstrator designed to help users explore, compare, and better understand XAI methods across different datasets, models, and configurations, and enables side-by-side comparison of methods and offers easy-to-understand supplementary information for different user groups.
Abstract
As AI‑based decision‑support systems become increasingly widespread, methods aimed at improving the performance of human-AI teams are gaining attention. In recent years, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has received growing interest, as it provides methods to make the behavior of machine learning models more transparent and can help to identify errors and flaws, which is particularly important in safety critical domains such as medicine and law. However, explanations themselves can be misleading, inconsistent, or incorrect, which makes it essential to raise awareness of the possibilities and limitations of these methods.
We introduce Lucyde, a web‑based demonstrator designed to help users explore, compare, and better understand XAI methods across different datasets, models, and configurations. Lucyde provides a curated collection of explanation techniques, enables side‑by‑side comparison of methods, and offers easy‑to‑understand supplementary information for different user groups. It also illustrates interactive machine learning workflows by allowing users to correct model outputs or explanations. Lucyde thereby fosters informed and reflective engagement with AI systems and their explanations.
Experimental findings show the effectiveness of XAI techniques to enhance interpretability without causing a major loss in predictive accuracy and the practical implications, limitations, and research directions on the future of explainable and trustworthy AI systems.
Unknown authors· International Journal of App...· 0 citations
XAI provides a powerful framework for responsible AI development, challenges such as the performance-interpretability trade-off, lack of standardized evaluation metrics, and potential for human misinterpretation remain areas of active research.
P. Pradhan, Amol Rajmane, C. patil· Journal of image processing...· 0 citations
It is concluded that explainability is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition for trustworthy Al, and concrete directions for future research are outlined, including standardised benchmarks, human-centred evaluation, and explainability for large generative models.
Afna Ashraff M, Archana K, Buthaina Buthaina et al.· International Journal of Tec...· 0 citations
The study suggests that explainable AI is a crucial factor in building intelligent, reliable, accountable, transparent, and effective AI-powered systems that can be deployed in realistic environments for decision making.
Kirankumar Pundlik Mohurle, S. Sahare, Yugant Rupesh Dhoke et al.· International Journal of Eng...· 0 citations
A methodology is advanced to embed explainability in the AI decision-making process, starting from data preprocessing to generating explanations and human evaluation, and the results highlight the potential of explainability to enhance human comprehension and foster responsible use of AI systems in high-stakes decision...
Mahabala H. N.· International Journal of Mod...· 0 citations
An accessible overview of XAI is provided, including saliency maps, perturbation-based and feature-attribution approaches, concept- based methods, and example-based reasoning, as well as uncertainty quantification as a complementary approach for assessing prediction reliability, along with common misconceptions and eme...
Gorkem Durak, H. Aktas, Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli et al.· Diagnostic and Interventiona...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.