Skip to content

Governing Agentic AI in Enterprise Operations: Architectural “Rails” for Safe, Deterministic, and Compliant Autonomous Systems

2026 · AHFE International · 0 citations

TL;DR

This paper argues that the introduction of agentic AI requires a substantial expansion of traditional enterprise architecture principles to address new behavioral, security, and governance risks emerging from non-deterministic AI systems interacting with heterogeneous operational platforms-ERP, HCM, CLM, asset management, workflow engines, and domain-specific applications.

Abstract

As enterprises accelerate the adoption of autonomous and agentic AI, the need for robust governance has become a critical architectural priority. Large organizations operate under strict regulatory, operational, and financial constraints, where even a single incorrect payment, billing error, or missed reconciliation can lead to significant compliance violations, audit failures, and material financial losses. These environments depend on deterministic, traceable, and verifiable execution; therefore, AI-driven automation cannot operate freely but must be deployed on well‑defined “rails” that enforce consistency, accountability, and operational safety. This paper argues that the introduction of agentic AI requires a substantial expansion of traditional enterprise architecture principles to address new behavioral, security, and governance risks emerging from non-deterministic AI systems interacting with heterogeneous operational platforms-ERP, HCM, CLM, asset management, workflow engines, and domain-specific applications. We propose a governance-centered framework for safe agentic AI in enterprise settings, emphasizing lifecycle oversight (model management, testing, deployment, rollback), cross-system policy enforcement, and auditable decision lineage. Central to this framework is a security model grounded in Just‑In‑Time (JIT) and Just‑Enough‑Access (JEA) permissions, ensuring that AI agents receive only the minimal privileges required, only when needed, and never with long‑standing or system‑wide access. Additional safeguards include least‑privilege design, segmentation boundaries, continuous audit trails, agent identity isolation, controlled inter-agent communication, and human‑in‑the‑loop escalation for high-risk or sensitive tasks. These controls prevent unauthorized lateral movement, protect sensitive financial and HR data, and ensure agent actions remain aligned with organizational risk and compliance boundaries. By integrating these governance mechanisms with orchestration and policy engines, enterprises can achieve predictable execution, transparent reasoning, and resilient automation at scale. This work highlights why governance is not peripheral but foundational to the safe deployment of agentic AI

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

LATTICE: a governance-first architecture for authorized autonomous AI operations

LATTICE (Layered Agentic Triad Topology for Intelligent Coordinated Execution), a governance-first architecture that reframes the authorization question from “do the authors trust this AI?” to “do they trust this architecture?”

Elias Calboreanu · 2 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A Contract-Centered Architecture for Scalable and Manageable Agentic Runtimes

A contract-bounded runtime architecture, a source-preserving data substrate, and a falsifiable measurement protocol are contributed, which proposes a cluster-period randomized crossover experiment with a four-state verdict: supported, falsified, conditional-engineering, or inconclusive.

Ya-Xiao Liu, Peng Liu, Yi-Wen Liu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI Governance Engineering: A Framework for Secure, Explainable, and Trustworthy Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Systems

This paper argues for a transition from AI Governance as Compliance to AI Governance Engineering , a systems-oriented discipline in which governance is embedded throughout the enterprise intelligence lifecycle, enabling enterprise intelligence systems that are secure, explainable, trustworthy, and governable by design.

Faruk Çelikkanat · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Enterprise Governance of Reusable Agentic AI Skills A Runtime Governance Framework Built on Dynamic Capability Projection and the Agent Harness as Trust Boundary

It is argued that reusable agent skills should be treated as first-class governed enterprise assets, and that the enterprise agent harness must serve as the runtime trust boundary at which a skill's authority is granted.

Sandeep Kumar Anuguthala · 0 citations
Open access 2026

The Agentic Enterprise Capability Framework (AECF): A Governance-First Architecture for Scalable AI Agent Deployments

The study contributes an integrated architectural model, propositional formalization, and validation agenda for governed enterprise AI agent deployments, and introduces the co-evolution constraint: technical capability layers cannot mature independently of governance capacity.

Khammal Adil, Hamzane Ibrahim, Marzak Abdelaziz et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

A Comparative Evaluation of AI Agent Orchestration Frameworks for Regulated Environments

The Exemplar is proposed as a reusable evaluation artifact for analyzing agentic orchestration frameworks under Compliance Management and Documentary Uncertainty, and shows clear trade-offs between flexibility and control, highlighting the importance of hybrid approaches that combine agentic reasoning with deterministi...

Renzo Zukeram, Vinícius Mergulhão, Yuri de Medeiros et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.