Skip to content
Open access

Multi-Horizon Machine Learning for Bridge Deterioration Prediction and Risk-Based Maintenance Decision-Making

Sep 2026 · Academic Journal of Applied Sciences · 0 citations · 39 references

Abstract

Bridge management agencies must decide not only which structures to treat, but when to treat them over a multi-year programme. Most machine-learning pipelines for bridge condition, however, forecast a single fixed horizon, report only marginal uncertainty, and feed a top-k selection rule that ignores treatment cost and timing. This paper proposes an integrated multi-horizon framework. (i) A horizon-conditioned learner (HCM) is trained on horizon-stacked data with a monotone constraint on the horizon variable, which guarantees coherent deterioration trajectories and, as a by-product, a valid discrete-time hazard and remaining-useful-life estimate. (ii) Predictive uncertainty is certified at the trajectory level by a locally adaptive max-norm conformal band, and calibrated first-passage risks are kept monotone by a coherence-preserving isotonic projection. (iii) A multi-horizon scheduling policy (MHSP) allocates a per-period budget by maximising discounted, consequence-weighted risk averted, solved as a linear-programming relaxation of a multiple-choice knapsack. On a 11,963-bridge NBI-schema longitudinal benchmark with explicit intervention counterfactuals, the HCM eliminates trajectory incoherence entirely (0.0% of bridges, versus 32.2–53.5% for independent per-horizon models and 43.8% for a recursive model) while also being the most accurate learner at every horizon (ROC-AUC 0.952 to 0.903 for h = 2 to 10 years). Per-horizon 90% conformal bands attain only 73.6% joint trajectory coverage; the proposed adaptive max-norm band reaches 89.9% joint coverage while being 9.9% narrower than a Bonferroni band. At a 15% programme budget, MHSP averts 51.9% of consequence-weighted Poor bridge-years, against 33.1% for a single-horizon risk×consequence index, 22.8% for condition-first and 10.6% for age-first triage, reaching 79.9% of a perfect-foresight upper bound. Code and benchmark are fully seeded and reproducible.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.