Skip to content
Preprint

A Heuristic Perspective on Debiasing Language Models

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 48 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

HEIMAT, a HEurIstic-style autoMATic debiasing framework for LMs, effectively mitigates bias in different cultures while maintaining the model's natural language understanding (NLU) performance.

Abstract

Language models (LMs) often acquire various biases during pre-training and may express them in interactions, potentially causing social harm. Existing methods often rely on counterfactual augmentation or representation projection. These strategies remain limited in practice due to their high computational costs and difficulty in scaling to larger models. Additionally, many of these strategies require manual data annotation, narrowing their scope to specific cultures and bias categories. To overcome these limitations, we propose HEIMAT, a HEurIstic-style autoMATic debiasing framework for LMs. HEIMAT consists of two main steps: bias disclosure and debiasing fine-tuning. In the first step, it uses simple templates to construct heuristic prompts, which are applied to reveal model biases and generate corresponding context prompts. In the second step, it fine-tunes the model by minimizing the Jensen-Shannon divergence of predictions on these context prompts to reduce bias. Extensive experiments show that HEIMAT effectively mitigates bias in different cultures while maintaining the model's natural language understanding (NLU) performance.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

All too perfect: bias and aspiration in persona generation with LLMs

It is proposed that persona-based evaluation can serve as a scalable diagnostic of what generative systems value and prioritize when depicting humanity, and that persona generations are far from neutral.

N. Corrêa, Rafaela Weber Mallmann, David Kaczér et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Deep and shallow biases in language models

A bias depth score is introduced that measures both how strongly a model prefers its top answer under direct prompting and whether that answer survives scenario reframing and shows that Deep biases are consistently harder to remove than Shallow biases.

A. Vo, V. Dang, Khai-Nguyen Nguyen et al. · 0 citations

The Pitfalls of Maximum Likelihood Training of TPMs for Controllable Language Generation

This work finds that likelihood-trained TPMs can result in failed generations due to overly large corrections to the LM’s logits, and trains TPMs with LM-aligned objectives that better align with the LM token-probability space.

Hanzhang Liu, William Zhao, Zi-Lei Shao et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Quantifying Social Biases in Language Model Classifiers is Domain-Dependent

This work investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can automatically adapt template-based bias datasets to specific domains using zero-shot prompting and shows that domain-adapted templates capture real-world bias patterns more faithfully than standard templates.

Tamara Quiroga, Felipe Bravo-Marquez, Valentin Barrière · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Analyzing and Correcting Benevolence Bias in Large Language Models

Benevolence bias is identified and measure, a small but consistent tendency for aligned LLMs to lean toward the kinder, safer, more socially approved answer on value-laden survey questions, and is easy to diagnose and straightforward to fix.

Yuanzi Li, Jun-Hao Wang, Minghui Liu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.