Skip to content
Open access

Psychological Approaches to Promoting Psychological Well-Being in Workplaces: A Positive Psychology-Based Theoretical Framework

2026 · International journal of research and innovation in social science · 0 citations

Abstract

Psychological well-being has become an increasingly important concern for contemporary workplaces as organizations confront occupational stress, workload pressures, rapid technological change, work-family demands, and changing expectations regarding meaningful employment. Traditional organizational approaches have frequently emphasized the prevention of psychological distress and the management of workplace risks. Although these approaches remain essential, a complementary positive psychology perspective focuses on the conditions that enable employees not merely to avoid psychological difficulties but to flourish. The present theoretical paper develops an integrative framework for promoting psychological well-being in workplaces through positive psychology approaches. Drawing on the PERMA model of well-being, self-determination theory, the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions, psychological capital, job demands-resources theory, strengths-based approaches, and positive organizational practices, the paper proposes the Positive Workplace Psychological Well-Being Framework (PWPWF). The framework conceptualizes workplace well-being as a dynamic process arising from interactions among individual psychological resources, interpersonal relationships, leadership practices, job characteristics, and organizational culture. It proposes five interconnected pathways: positive emotional experiences, strengths and engagement, meaningful relationships, purpose and meaning, and accomplishment and psychological growth. These pathways are supported by autonomy, competence, relatedness, psychological capital, job resources, and psychologically supportive organizational environments. The framework further proposes that organizational interventions should operate simultaneously at individual, interpersonal, leadership, and organizational levels rather than placing responsibility for well-being exclusively on employees. The paper concludes with theoretical propositions, practical implications, and limitations. The revised framework is formalized through a conceptual diagram, explicit hypotheses, a construct-boundary matrix, and defined contextual boundary conditions to support future empirical testing.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.