Skip to content
Preprint

Certified decoding of quantum LDPC codes

Aug 2026 · 2 citations · ⚡ 1 influential · 41 references
Physics Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

This work treats degenerate decoding as probabilistic inference in an undirected graphical model: the probability of each logical class is the partition function of an unconstrained, strictly positive Markov random field over the code's check variables, a construction that generalizes the random-bond Ising mapping of the surface code.

Abstract

Quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes reduce the qubit overhead of fault-tolerant quantum computation by an order of magnitude, but their decoding is harder than its classical counterpart: because many physical errors are equivalent up to stabilizers, the degenerate maximum-likelihood (ML) decoder must compare the probabilities of entire equivalence classes of errors, that is, partition functions, rather than single errors. The workhorse decoder BP+OSD sidesteps degeneracy heuristically and offers no guarantees. We treat degenerate decoding as probabilistic inference in an undirected graphical model: the probability of each logical class is the partition function of an unconstrained, strictly positive Markov random field over the code's check variables, a construction that generalizes the random-bond Ising mapping of the surface code to arbitrary CSS codes and to spacetime decoding with measurement errors and circuit-level noise. On this model we build two decoders. The first estimates all class partition functions by annealed importance sampling with common random numbers and attaches to every decision a certificate of optimality: a paired bootstrap test, or, composed with constant-factor estimators such as WISH, an exact optimality proof. The second is region-based: the Bethe free energy, whose bias cancels between classes, reproduces exact ML decoding on every tested surface-code instance at millisecond cost, and enlarging the regions to elimination clusters makes exact degenerate ML decoding of the [[72,12,6]] bivariate bicycle code feasible. Across surface codes and the bivariate bicycle codes [[72,12,6]] and [[144,12,12]], under code-capacity, phenomenological, and circuit-level noise, the sampling decoder matches or exceeds BP+OSD while certifying the bulk of its decisions, and the certificate flags exactly the syndromes on which any fast decoder should be distrusted.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

Coherent error threshold for quantum LDPC codes

A key appeal of quantum low-density parity check (qLDPC) codes is their ability to suppress stochastic Pauli noise below nonzero thresholds. Coherent errors are fundamentally different: they produce superpositions of error patterns whose amplitudes can interfere even after syndrome measurement. Rigorous understanding o...

Zhen Han, Yuan-Yuan Zhao, Yijia Xu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Soft decoding for quantum LDPC codes with experimental validation

The decoder is a critical component of a fault-tolerant quantum computer, computing corrections based on parity-check measurements performed throughout the computation. A soft decoder supplements its output with a confidence score which, when used alongside post-selection, can substantially improve logical performance....

Arda Aydin, Edwin Tham, Nicolas Delfosse et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Quantum Message Passing Convergence and Vanishing Block-Error Probability for Random LDPC Codes

Belief propagation with quantum messages (BPQM) is a quantum algorithm that decodes classical codes transmitted over classical--quantum channels. It realizes optimal decoding on tree factor graphs over pure-state classical-quantum channels. However, this tree-based analysis does not ensure vanishing block-error probabi...

Avijit Mandal, C. Piveteau, J. Renes et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

Proof of a positive coherent-error threshold for topological quantum codes

Threshold analyses of quantum error-correcting codes are well established for stochastic error models, in which errors occur randomly with given probabilities. However, errors in actual devices can also be coherent, such as unwanted $Z$ rotations due to imperfect control, which are not captured by stochastic error mode...

Shiro Tamiya, Masato Koashi · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Learning unknown stabilizer codes using product measurements

Efficiently characterizing quantum error correcting codes is a key challenge on the path to fault-tolerant quantum computation. Stabilizer codes, a central class of such codes, are defined by a set of stabilizer generators. Here, we present an algorithm that uses random single-qubit measurements to learn the stabilizer...

Heather Leitch, Sri.S.Tirukkovalluri, Ying-Kai Ouyang · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.