Skip to content
Open access

A Two-Stage Adversarial Defense Architecture for Robust Fraud Detection on Imbalanced Financial Data

2026 · Computers, Materials & Continua · 0 citations · 23 references

TL;DR

This paper proposes a unified dual-defense framework that jointly integrates adversarial training with a denoising autoencoder (DAE)-based filtering mechanism, specifically designed for imbalanced tabular financial data under adversarial conditions, and explicitly targets adversarial robustness in financial fraud detection.

Abstract

: As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in financial systems, ensuring the security and robustness of these models is critical, particularly in sensitive tasks like credit card fraud detection. Despite their predictive success, deep learning models remain vulnerable to adversarial examples: subtly manipulated inputs that can mislead classification outcomes. Unlike existing approaches that typically rely on either adversarial training or standalone input filtering, this paper proposes a unified dual-defense framework that jointly integrates adversarial training with a denoising autoencoder (DAE)-based filtering mechanism, specifically designed for imbalanced tabular financial data under adversarial conditions. Using a real-world, imbalanced credit card transaction dataset of 284,807 transactions, the proposed method achieves superior performance on clean data with an accuracy of 0.991, F1-score of 0.872, and Area Under the Precision–Recall Curve (AUC-PR) of 0.952. Under adversarial conditions, the framework maintains robustness, achieving an F1-score of 0.648 against Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and 0.610 against Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) attacks, outperforming baseline models by margins of > 0.10 in F1. In contrast to prior work that primarily focuses on predictive performance or single-defense strategies, the proposed approach explicitly targets adversarial robustness in financial fraud detection through a complementary integration of defense mechanisms. Ablation studies confirm the complementary effect of adversarial training and DAE-based filtering, while detection analysis shows an adversarial detection accuracy of 87.8%. These findings highlight the practicality of hybrid defense strategies for improving the trustworthiness of AI systems in finance.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Adversarial Robustness of Machine Learning-based Fraud Detection Systems: An Empirical Evaluation of Attack Impact and Mitigation in Fintech Environments

The findings support the adoption of adversarial training for gradient-based fraud detection models and suggest that robustness claims should be accompanied by disclosure of the attack methodology used to establish them.

Ololade Zainab Adesokan, Abiola Omolola Bamsa, O. Obioha-Val et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2018

Adversarial Robustness in ML Models for Detecting Synthetic Identity Fraud in Credit Risk

This paper investigates the adversarial robustness of various machine learning models applied to synthetic identity fraud detection in credit risk settings, and proposes and assess defense mechanisms, including adversarial training and robust feature engineering, to enhance model resilience.

Arvind Kumar Singh, Lakshmi Narayanan · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

A Hybrid Generative Adversarial Network and Random Forest Architecture for Enhanced Fraud Detection in Unified Payments Interface (UPI) Systems

Financial fraud in digital payment systems is a major cybersecurity issue. Global losses exceed $32 billion each year, and fraud-detection methods are constantly improving to keep pace with increasingly complex attack patterns. One significant challenge in fraud analytics is the severe class imbalance. Fraudulent trans...

Hiteshkumar M. Nimbark, Hansiniba P. Jadeja, Evan H. Habibani · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Open access 2026

Adversarial Machine Learning: Security Risks and Defense Strategies in AI-Driven Applications

A detailed overview of the security risks associated with adversarial attacks is offered, including evasion attacks carried out at inference time, data poisoning that corrupts the training process, backdoor insertion that hides dormant triggers inside a model, and model inversion that leaks private information back out...

Harsh Verma · 1 citation
Aug 2026

Enhancing robustness of deep learning-based malware detection against adversarial attacks

This paper introduces DefendMal, a novel framework that synergistically combines Denoise Autoencoder with Sequence Squeezing, a Context-aware Adversarial Generator (CAG-AdvGAN), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) adversarial training, and a Positive–Negative Detector with Variational Autoencoder (PNDetector-VAE) to enhan...

Dennis Benedict Crasta, Vikash Kumar · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.