2026· Computers, Materials & Continua· 0 citations· 23 references
TL;DR
This paper proposes a unified dual-defense framework that jointly integrates adversarial training with a denoising autoencoder (DAE)-based filtering mechanism, specifically designed for imbalanced tabular financial data under adversarial conditions, and explicitly targets adversarial robustness in financial fraud detection.
Abstract
: As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in financial systems, ensuring the security and robustness of these models is critical, particularly in sensitive tasks like credit card fraud detection. Despite their predictive success, deep learning models remain vulnerable to adversarial examples: subtly manipulated inputs that can mislead classification outcomes. Unlike existing approaches that typically rely on either adversarial training or standalone input filtering, this paper proposes a unified dual-defense framework that jointly integrates adversarial training with a denoising autoencoder (DAE)-based filtering mechanism, specifically designed for imbalanced tabular financial data under adversarial conditions. Using a real-world, imbalanced credit card transaction dataset of 284,807 transactions, the proposed method achieves superior performance on clean data with an accuracy of 0.991, F1-score of 0.872, and Area Under the Precision–Recall Curve (AUC-PR) of 0.952. Under adversarial conditions, the framework maintains robustness, achieving an F1-score of 0.648 against Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and 0.610 against Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) attacks, outperforming baseline models by margins of > 0.10 in F1. In contrast to prior work that primarily focuses on predictive performance or single-defense strategies, the proposed approach explicitly targets adversarial robustness in financial fraud detection through a complementary integration of defense mechanisms. Ablation studies confirm the complementary effect of adversarial training and DAE-based filtering, while detection analysis shows an adversarial detection accuracy of 87.8%. These findings highlight the practicality of hybrid defense strategies for improving the trustworthiness of AI systems in finance.
The findings support the adoption of adversarial training for gradient-based fraud detection models and suggest that robustness claims should be accompanied by disclosure of the attack methodology used to establish them.
Ololade Zainab Adesokan, Abiola Omolola Bamsa, O. Obioha-Val et al.· Journal of Engineering Resea...· 0 citations
This paper investigates the adversarial robustness of various machine learning models applied to synthetic identity fraud detection in credit risk settings, and proposes and assess defense mechanisms, including adversarial training and robust feature engineering, to enhance model resilience.
Arvind Kumar Singh, Lakshmi Narayanan· International Journal of Com...· 0 citations
Financial fraud in digital payment systems is a major cybersecurity issue. Global losses exceed $32 billion each year, and fraud-detection methods are constantly improving to keep pace with increasingly complex attack patterns. One significant challenge in fraud analytics is the severe class imbalance. Fraudulent trans...
Hiteshkumar M. Nimbark, Hansiniba P. Jadeja, Evan H. Habibani· DMPedia Lecture Notes in Com...· 0 citations
Fraud robustness evaluation should report predictive degradation and attack feasibility jointly, and should incorporate domain constraints into attack generation rather than treating them as post-processing checks.
Xitong Zeng, Zhaoge Bi, Yi-Tian Yang et al.· 0 citations
A detailed overview of the security risks associated with adversarial attacks is offered, including evasion attacks carried out at inference time, data poisoning that corrupts the training process, backdoor insertion that hides dormant triggers inside a model, and model inversion that leaks private information back out...
Harsh Verma· International Journal of Sci...· 1 citation
This paper introduces DefendMal, a novel framework that synergistically combines Denoise Autoencoder with Sequence Squeezing, a Context-aware Adversarial Generator (CAG-AdvGAN), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) adversarial training, and a Positive–Negative Detector with Variational Autoencoder (PNDetector-VAE) to enhan...
Dennis Benedict Crasta, Vikash Kumar· Journal of Computer Virology...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.