Skip to content
Log in
Review Open access

Understanding university students’ AI ethical decision-making in academic contexts: a SOR - social cognitive perspective

Hao Deng Minli Yang Liling Huang Zhixin Yang Nan Jiang
Jul 2026 · Frontiers in Psychology · Vol 17 · 0 citations · 63 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The findings advance academic integrity research by shifting attention from attitudes to scenario-based decision quality and clarifying the internalization mechanism through moral cognition.

Abstract

Introduction The integration of generative artificial intelligence into higher education has reshaped students’ academic practices and blurred normative boundaries around academic integrity. While prior research has focused mainly on attitudes and usage intentions, limited attention has been paid to students’ AI ethical decision-making in academic scenarios and its psychological mechanisms. This study examined the associations among AI ethics guidance, academic ethics course experience, moral cognition, cognitive complexity, and AI ethical decision-making. It tested whether moral cognition mediated the relationships between normative inputs and AI ethical decision-making and whether cognitive complexity strengthened these relationships. The study integrated the Stimulus–Organism–Response framework with Social Cognitive Theory and combined net-effect, configurational, and importance–performance analyses. Methods Survey data were collected from 1,106 undergraduates at Chinese universities. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was used to test direct, mediating, and moderating relationships, complemented by fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to identify configurational pathways to high AI ethical decision-making. Importance–performance matrix analysis identified intervention priorities. Results AI ethics guidance (β = 0.334, p < 0.001) and academic ethics course experience (β = 0.336, p < 0.001) were positively associated with AI ethical decision-making. Both normative inputs were positively associated with moral cognition (β = 0.479 and 0.280, respectively; p < 0.001), which was positively associated with AI ethical decision-making (β = 0.215, p < 0.001). Significant indirect relationships were identified through moral cognition (indirect β = 0.103 and 0.060; p < 0.001). Cognitive complexity strengthened the relationships between the two normative inputs and AI ethical decision-making (β = 0.077 and 0.073; p < 0.05). The model explained 66.3% of the variance in AI ethical decision-making (R2 = 0.663). fsQCA revealed no single necessary condition; however, AI ethics guidance and academic ethics course experience consistently emerged as core conditions across high-performing configurations (overall consistency = 0.934; coverage = 0.793). Discussion The findings advance academic integrity research by shifting attention from attitudes to scenario-based decision quality and clarifying the internalization mechanism through moral cognition. Practically, they highlight the complementary roles of technological prompts and academic ethics course experience in fostering students’ AI ethical decision-making.

DOI PubMed Semantic Scholar
Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

Academic Integrity in the Era of Generative AI: Students’ Perceptions, Ethical Boundaries, and Risk-Taking Behavior in Nigerian Universities

It is concluded that AI-related academic misconduct is often a rational behavioral choice driven by perceived institutional unpreparedness rather than ignorance, and calls for a transition toward adaptive academic integrity frameworks that prioritize ethical awareness and transparent academic policy communications to students.

Ignatius Ogbaga, U. Onwudebelu, Nathaniel Akwuma et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Digital Literacy as Ethical Competence: Research Integrity in AI-Mediated Academic Work among LIS Students in Nigeria

This study explores how digital literacy shapes research integrity among final-year Library and Information Science students at the University of Ilorin, Nigeria, within AI-mediated academic environments. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach, data were collected from thirty participants through interviews and focus groups and analysed thematically to capture students’ experiences of digital research and ethical decision making. The findings show that although students display strong ethical awareness linked to their professional identity, this does not always translate into practice. Digital competence supports source evaluation and reference management, but also enables uncritical copying, use of rewriting tools, and uncertain engagement with artificial intelligence, especially under academic pressure. Behaviour is further influenced by inconsistent supervision, unclear institutional guidance, and peer norms. The study reframes digital literacy as an ethical competence rather than a purely technical skill, showing that its role in research integrity depends on intention and context. It contributes evidence from an underexplored African setting and highlights the need for clearer, discipline-sensitive policies on AI use, alongside stronger supervision and integrity education.

A. Dunmade · 0 citations
Review 2026

Ethical Decision-Making in the Digital Age: A Statistical Study of Moral Judgments among University Students

Inrecent years, digital technology has quietly become part of almost every decision young people make-whether it is sharing content, using AI tools, or interacting on social media. This study tries to understand how university students make ethical decisions in such situations. A total of 230 students from different academic backgrounds participated in the survey. The study used structured questionnaires covering demographic and behavioral aspects.The findings suggest that while most students are aware of ethical concerns in the digital world, their actual decisions do not always match that awareness. For instance, many students considered privacy important, yet a noticeable number admitted to sharing content without full verification or consent. Statisticalanalysis indicated that factors like academic discipline, frequency of internet use, and exposure to ethical education may influence moral judgments.Therefore, the present study highlights a small but important gap between what students believe is right and what they actually do online. It suggests that universities may need to focus more on practical ethical training rather than only theoretical discussions.

Dr. Rajashree Tripathy · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Navigating generative AI in higher education: Freshers’ perceptions of ethics in AI, digital learning behavior, and institutional norms

First-year university students’ perceptions of generative AI in academic work are investigated, foregrounding student agency in a Global South context and offering pedagogical and policy implications for responsible AI adoption.

Sharifuzzaman, M. Rahman · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Negotiating AI in academic writing: Student voices on autonomy, ethics, and process-based learning

The adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in academic writing has been widely discussed in terms of its impact on writing performance and efficiency, with little attention given to how students actively negotiate its place in process-oriented pedagogies. To fill this gap, this paper investigates how university students negotiate autonomy, ethical responsibility, and cognitive engagement in the context of integrating AI into a Process-Based Approach (PBA) to academic writing. A qualitative-dominant mixed-method design was used. Data were collected from 103 students from eight universities in Indonesia using four Likert-scale questionnaires and open-ended responses, and analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Findings suggest that AI is perceived as a form of cognitive support for lower-order writing processes, such as grammar, vocabulary, and idea generation, while students aim to retain control. However, support also produces tensions of overreliance, reduced critical participation, and challenges to academic integrity. Students are beginning to understand the ethical limits, especially when it comes to AI being a tool that helps them with their own writing rather than replacing it. The findings indicate that AI-mediated writing is not only a matter of tool use but a site of negotiation, in which learners negotiate efficiency, autonomy, and authenticity.

Rizky Lutviana, Teguh Sulistyo, Maria Purnawati · 0 citations