Skip to content

OFDM-Assisted Over-the-Air Computation With Privacy Protection in Federated Learning

Nov 2026 · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · Vol 25, pp. 21266-21277 · 0 citations · 43 references

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) is an emerging distributed machine learning paradigm that protects data privacy by performing iterative local training and gradient aggregation across multiple devices and a central server. Over-the-air computation enables fast aggregation when multiple devices need to upload their local gradients to the central server simultaneously. Orthogonal Frequency Division Modulation (OFDM) further accelerates this process by allowing concurrent symbol transmission over multiple fading channels. To address the challenge of non-linear distortion at the OFDM transmitter’s amplifier while ensuring privacy for each device, we propose a novel aggregation method: OFDM-assisted over-the-air computation for differential privacy (DP) in FL (OA2DPFL). This method first normalizes local gradients and then adds uniformly distributed artificial noise before uploading them to the central server. Our analysis demonstrates that the proposed approach effectively controls peak transmit power and establishes a quantitative relationship between the variance of artificial noise and the level of DP protection. Furthermore, we rigorously prove that OA2DPFL achieves a zero <italic>stationary</italic> optimality gap under general <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\displaystyle L$</tex-math><alternatives><mml:math><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mstyle></mml:math><inline-graphic xlink:href="fan-ieq1-3715532.gif"/></alternatives></inline-formula>-smooth (non-convex) loss functions, and a zero <italic>global</italic> optimality gap under <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\displaystyle L$</tex-math><alternatives><mml:math><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mstyle></mml:math><inline-graphic xlink:href="fan-ieq2-3715532.gif"/></alternatives></inline-formula>-smooth and strongly convex loss functions, both with a convergence rate of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\displaystyle \mathcal {O}(1/T^{1/2-\rho })$</tex-math><alternatives><mml:math><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math><inline-graphic xlink:href="fan-ieq3-3715532.gif"/></alternatives></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\displaystyle T$</tex-math><alternatives><mml:math><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mstyle></mml:math><inline-graphic xlink:href="fan-ieq4-3715532.gif"/></alternatives></inline-formula> is the iteration number and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\displaystyle \rho \in (0,1/2)$</tex-math><alternatives><mml:math><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:math><inline-graphic xlink:href="fan-ieq5-3715532.gif"/></alternatives></inline-formula>. Experimental results validate the superiority of OA2DPFL in terms of peak power, convergence performance, and DP protection compared to baseline methods.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.