"Hot-Blooded" vs "Cold-Blooded": Simulating the Behavioral Phenotypes of Childhood Aggression via Generative Agents

Abstract

This study examines the construct validity of LLM-based generative agents in simulating reactive, proactive, and co-occurring aggression in children. Four distinct agents were instantiated using a theory-driven parameterization grounded in the social information processing model. A total of 1,920 simulation runs were conducted across eight social scenarios, employing a hybrid blind-coding pipeline to extract 32 quantitative behavioral indicators. Results demonstrate robust discriminant validity relative to a non-aggressive baseline, with large effect sizes. High cross-seed reliability confirms that behavioral differentiation is driven by underlying psychological parameters rather than model stochasticity. Qualitative narrative analyses further converged with established empirical literature. Overall, these findings indicate that theory-parameterized LLM agents can accurately reproduce distinct aggression subtypes, offering a scalable, highly controllable framework for hypothesis generation, intervention piloting, and the refinement of psychological measurement tools.