Aug 2026· Hearing Research· Vol 481, pp.
109776
· 0 citations· 67 references
Medicine
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of noise and reverberation on recognition of Dutch digits-in-noise (DIN) test triplets. The findings demonstrate that the STIDIN, an adaptation to the standard speech transmission index (STI), provides a reliable, low‑error predictor of DIN test performance in conditions with noise and/or reverberation when only a single speech recognition threshold (SRT) measurement in noise is completed. To achieve this, twenty-four normal-hearing (NH) adults completed adaptive SRT measurements in noise-only, reverberation-only and combined noise and reverberation conditions using unprocessed (UP), low-pass filtered (LPF) and cochlear implant vocoded (CIvoc) speech materials. Standard STI values differed across conditions and overestimated the detrimental effect of reverberation on recognition. The STIDIN, derived from the magnitude cross power spectrum (mCPS) of reverberated DIN test triplets and unprocessed triplets, was applicable for T60 reverberation times up to 12 s. STIDIN values remained constant across conditions, showing no significant main effect of condition for any of the unprocessed and processed speech materials. The results show that when an SRTn measurement in noise-only is obtained using DIN test triplets (i.e., the clinical standard), the STIDIN can be used to predict the SRT in other listening conditions with noise and reverberation. The root‑mean‑square error between measured and predicted SRTs was 0.92 dB, and 95 % of predictions deviated <1.7 dB from the measured values in conditions with noise and/or reverberation.
The ezSRT test is capable of producing reliable SRT estimates in 6 min that are sensitive to different experimental conditions and listener groups and that result in different SiN performance levels when later tested in a fixed SNR configuration, and using the ezSRT test as part of the new i-RRT protocol to determine S...
Christopher Slugocki, Francis Kuk, Petri Korhonen et al.· Ear and Hearing· 1 citation
The results showed that the BIF of the Dutch DIN test substantially deviates from other BIFs, particularly in the contribution of high frequencies, particularly in the contribution of high frequencies.
Nick van Huis, N. Versfeld, C. Smits· Hearing Research· 0 citations
This study examined how nativeness affects the performance of spatial release from masking (SRM) during a task detecting speech in noise under anechoic and reverberant environments. While previous research has primarily focused on speech intelligibility, the differences in SRM performance in terms of detecting speech e...
Yukina Sakamoto, Taiki Matsubara, Shinya Tsuji et al.· Journal of the Acoustical So...· 0 citations
The results reported here demonstrate the benefits of unique noise reduction features to improve listener performance across multiple objective measures, and listener variability may in part be explained by suprathreshold and cognitive abilities.
Erol J. Ozmeral, Carrie A. Secor, Nathan C. Higgins· Journal of the Acoustical So...· 0 citations
A simple spectro-temporal ripple discrimination test is a reliable predictor of speech-in-noise outcome 1 year after cochlear implantation, over and above established clinical speech tests.
J. Erb, M. Wöstmann, Jens Kreitewolf et al.· Ear and Hearing· 0 citations
A method to transform imperceptible ITDs into low-frequency ILDs is investigated to assess the binaural benefit that can be gained and suggest that this cue conversion method could potentially bring a benefit to hearing impaired and elderly listeners when implemented in cochlear implants and hearing aids.
Timm-Jonas Bäumer, Johannes W. de Vries, S. Töpken et al.· Journal of the Acoustical So...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.