Skip to content

Schr ¨odinger’s CoT: Measuring the Causal Effect of Chains of Thought Alters That Effect

· 0 citations · 35 references

TL;DR

This work uses mechanistic interventions in order to disentangle whether reasoning chains should be viewed as a cause of vs. a justification for the model’s final answer, and finds that the answer to this question is complicated by the fact that the interpretability tools on which the model uses influence the mechanism the model uses, and thus the fidelity of the chain itself.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

The Tell-Tale Trace: Detecting Reasoning Failures in LLMs Using Chain-of-Thought Dynamics

Results show that capability failures can manifest as distributed, task-dependent changes in the structure of visible reasoning, and that CoT dynamics agnostic to whether the verbalized trace reflects the model's internal computations can help diagnose and correct failures.

Shashwat Sourav, Aishwarya H. Balwani · 1 citation
Jul 2026

CASE: Causal Alignment and Structural Enforcement for Improving Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness

Experiments show that CASE achieves a 37\% average per-setting relative improvement in overall CoT faithfulness over the strongest baselines, exhibits stronger cross-dataset faithfulness transfer, and maintains competitive average accuracy.

Ziming Wang, Yinghua Yao, Changwu Huang et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

For What Reason? Interpreting Models' Encoding of Causation and Antithesis

This work investigates how instruction-tuned Transformer models (LLaMA and Mistral) encode discourse relations in English, with a particular focus on the contrasting relations of causation and antithesis, suggesting asymmetric representation of discourse-based reasoning.

A. Bhattacharyya, Shira Wein · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Legibility is Not Interpretability: Comparing Judged and Actual Importance in Chain-Of-Thought Reasoning

This work operationalizes the importance of a reasoning step as its advantage: the change in expected reward, e.g., producing the correct final answer, from including that step, estimated via Monte Carlo rollouts, and evaluates whether LLM judges can identify high-advantage steps and finds that sufficiently capable LLM...

Kevin Du, A. Hoyle, L. Ruis et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.