The Impact of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Undertesting on Estimates of Disease Burden and Vaccine Effectiveness in a Large Integrated Healthcare System

Abstract

Abstract Background Infrequent standard-of-care (SOC) testing for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in adults with acute respiratory illness (ARI) contributes to underestimated disease burden. Methods We compared RSV prevalence and RSV vaccine effectiveness (VE) among 14 044 adults ≥60 years with ARI emergency department (ED)/hospital admissions receiving SOC RSV testing vs those with SOC or salvaged respiratory specimen RSV testing. Results RSV was identified in 139 (0.99%) specimens by SOC testing alone vs 483 (3.44%) via SOC combined with salvage testing. Conclusions Precision of VE against RSV-related ARI ED/hospital admissions improved substantially with inclusion of salvage testing compared to SOC testing alone (92% [67%–98%] vs 90% [29%–99%]).