The smallest programmable machine and the hardness of analyzing it

Abstract

We investigate the computational complexity of analyzing the structural and behavioral properties of deterministic k-pebble automata, which represent a natural framework for studying minimal programmable machines. First, we provide an explicit construction of a three-pebble automaton U capable of simulating any deterministic finite automaton (DFA) on a given input word, establishing a link between pebble automata capabilities, Kolmogorov complexity, and automatic complexity. Next, we restrict our architectural framework to two-pebble programmable machines U(2,N) simulating DFAs with at most N states. We analyze the decision problem ANAL(U(2,5)), which asks whether a five-state program can separate two distinct finite words. By establishing a polynomial-time reduction from the quasi-identity checking problem for finite semigroups, we prove that ANAL(U(2,5)) is NP-complete. Finally, we explore the complexity of separating binary strings under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), showing how computational hardness implies polynomial lower bounds for the size of the smallest DFAs separating binary strings.