GABench is introduced, a comprehensive benchmark for agentic graph analysis that covers four graph analysis task categories: graph retrieval, graph theory, graph machine learning, and graph open-ended question answering and provides practical insights into the development and evaluation of LLM agents for graph analysis.
Abstract
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly capable of planning, using tools, and interacting with external environments. They are typically supported by harnesses, which manage state and coordinate multi-step execution. Graph analysis provides a promising setting for evaluating their agentic capabilities, because it requires agents to access data and execute operations in a graph environment. However, existing graph benchmarks for LLMs provide limited coverage of graph tasks and graph types, making it difficult to comprehensively evaluate LLM agents. Moreover, they typically formulate graph analysis as text-based question answering, where graph information is directly provided in the prompt, limiting the evaluation of end-to-end agentic capabilities. To address these limitations, we introduce GABench, a comprehensive benchmark for agentic graph analysis. GABench spans three graph types and covers four graph analysis task categories: graph retrieval, graph theory, graph machine learning, and graph open-ended question answering. GABench also provides 84 executable tools for accessing graph data and performing diverse graph operations. Building on these tools, we develop an agentic graph analysis task generation pipeline and construct 10,400 tasks with verifiable ground truth.Using GABench, we evaluate a range of frontier LLMs and agent harnesses. Our experiments reveal three key findings: (1) Existing LLM agents still struggle with complex graph analysis tasks. (2) Harness choice significantly affects performance, yet existing harnesses remain limited on complex graph tasks. (3) Graph analysis depends more on tool-call quality than quantity. Our findings provide practical insights into the development and evaluation of LLM agents for graph analysis.
This work introduces a generalizable evaluation framework that maps native MAS traces into a shared space of unified collaboration graphs, enabling different methods to be evaluated under the same representation, reference set, and metric panel.
Large language models (LLMs) have made progress in knowledge-intensive tasks, reasoning and planning, and collaborative problem solving, yet they exhibit intrinsic limitations such as knowledge cutoff, single-threaded reasoning that hinders finer-grained branch and aggregation, and rigid collaboration mechanisms that struggle to coordinate specialized capabilities. Graphs, with their ability to represent relational knowledge and complex dependencies, offer a natural means to address these limitations: they provide structured, high-density knowledge for augmenting or correcting LLMs’ generation; enable revisitable inference by organizing intermediate steps as graphs; and support dynamic coordination among experts or agents in collaborative settings. Motivated by these developments, we present the first systematic survey of graph-assisted LLMs from the perspective of how graph structures mitigate LLMs’ limitations. We introduce a taxonomy spanning Graph-Assisted Knowledge Augmentation, Graph-Assisted Reasoning and Planning, and Graph-Assisted LLM Collaboration , and analyze representative methods, summarize common design patterns, and outline open challenges and future directions for advancing LLMs with graph-based enhancements. The collected papers are available in link here.
Haitong Luo, Fali Wang, Weiyao Zhang et al.· Annual Meeting of the Associ...· 2 citations
Graph reasoning provides a promising testbed for evaluating the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), as graph instances can be programmatically generated, structurally controlled, and naturally scaled to long-input settings. However, existing graph reasoning benchmarks have limited coverage of data complexity, rely heavily on manual construction, and lack unified evaluation across text-based and code-based reasoning modes. To address these limitations, we propose {\dataset}, a five-stage \textit{semi-automatic} framework for constructing complex graph reasoning benchmarks. It expands benchmark coverage along five dimensions: \textit{Graph Size}, \textit{Task Complexity}, \textit{Task Description}, \textit{Graph Loading}, and \textit{Task Source}. The framework uses an LLM-based data generator to automatically produce task descriptions, graph data, reference solutions, graph-loading scripts, question forms, and evaluation scripts, while retaining human validation at key quality-control stages. Based on it, we construct a benchmark with $202$ tasks and evaluate LLMs under text-based, code-based, and augmented reasoning settings. Experiments show that the complexity dimensions reveal model limitations that are less visible in existing benchmarks; existing fine-tuned models struggle to generalize to GraphGym, whereas retrieval-augmented methods show scenario-dependent adaptability, improving textual reasoning but not consistently improving coding reasoning. These findings suggest that ours serves as a challenging and diagnostic benchmark for graph reasoning and provides empirical guidance for future enhancement methods. Code and dataset will be published soon.
Fali Wang, Ali Al-Lawati, Iliyas Bektas et al.· 0 citations
Experiments across diverse multi-agent workloads show that AGAO improves task effectiveness while reducing unnecessary computation, latency, and token consumption compared with existing graph-based execution strategies.
GATS (Graph-Augmented Tree Search), a planning framework that combines systematic UCB1-based tree search with a layered world model to eliminate LLM calls during inference while achieving superior planning performance, is presented.
Tool-calling LLM agents navigate unfamiliar codebases with a handful of generic primitives for listing, reading and searching files (ls, cat, grep). A knowledge graph admits the same interface: listing neighbours, reading node content and searching descriptions are the same operations on a different substrate. Building on this correspondence, we present GRA, a Graph Reasoning Agent that explores hybrid knowledge graphs, whose nodes are either textual concepts or relational tables, with seven generic tools, discovering everything domain-specific at run time. On UFK-M (Unified Factory Knowledge Model), an industrial benchmark of 258 analytical questions whose gold answers are produced by executing validated SQL programs, GRA beats a full-context agent by 5.1 pp (88.4% vs. 83.3%), while reading under a third of its input tokens. A graph-free control shows the gain comes chiefly from selective agentic access rather than graph topology, and that the effect depends on a model able to drive tools reliably. Seeing less, the agent answers better: selective navigation over a structured substrate beats exhaustive context.
M. Dragić, Ruben Ifrah, Alexandre Rio· 0 citations