From Curiosity to Conformity: The CUET Crisis

Abstract

This essay attempts to critically examine the Common University Entrance Test (CUET) as implemented under NEP 2020, highlighting its structural flaws and impact on higher education. While intended to democratise access, CUET has instead exposed systemic weaknesses: poorly drafted question papers privileging rote learning over interpretation, unreliable answer keys undermining fairness, chaotic examination centres disregarding student welfare, and malfunctioning digital platforms that compromise performance. Far from fostering inclusion, the format often excludes disadvantaged groups, privileging those with access to coaching and resources. Teachers report classrooms filled with students uninterested students, diluting academic rigour and growth. The essay argues that CUET reflects a philosophy of standardisation and surveillance rather than genuine engagement, risking a culture of conformity.