This review provides a critical chemistry-to-clinical perspective on smart wearable biosensors and outlines the validation, manufacturing, cybersecurity, post-market surveillance and benchmarking requirements needed for their translation into reliable diagnostic and therapeutic-monitoring technologies.
Abstract
Smart wearable biosensors represent a significant paradigm shift from one-time sample analysis to real-time biochemical monitoring at the body interface. Besides the flexible design of the device or wireless readout, their clinical utility will also require the reliability of the entire sensing pathway under real physiological conditions. This pathway involves biofluid access to clinical interpretation. Despite rapid progress, many wearable biosensor platforms remain limited by weak biofluid–blood correlation, receptor degradation, biofouling, motion artefacts, sensor drift and insufficient patient-level validation. Thus, a chemistry-to-clinics approach is crucial to assess the analytical reliability and translational readiness of recognition elements, sensing materials, and engineered biointerfaces. Enzymes, antibodies, aptamers, nucleic-acid systems, molecularly imprinted polymers, and nanozymes are discussed within the context of selectivity, stability, antifouling behaviour and suitability for continuous monitoring of sweat, interstitial fluid, tears, wound exudate and breath condensate. The functionality of carbon nanostructures, metal-based nanomaterials, hydrogels, MXenes, metal–organic frameworks and self-powered interfaces are evaluated in terms of their applications in amplification, mechanical conformity, biofluid handling and signal stability. Artificial intelligence is positioned as a support layer for signal correction, calibration, classification, multimodal fusion and predictive interpretation, rather than as a substitute for robust sensing chemistry. This review provides a critical chemistry-to-clinical perspective on smart wearable biosensors and outlines the validation, manufacturing, cybersecurity, post-market surveillance and benchmarking requirements needed for their translation into reliable diagnostic and therapeutic-monitoring technologies.
Functionalized design is presented as an application‐backward, cross‐scale framework that links clinical needs and biomarker–matrix constraints with recognition chemistry, biointerfaces, functional materials, transduction architectures, calibration, data interpretation, manufacturability, and validation.
Ya-Nan Li, Yang Zhou, Meng Yang et al.· Advanced Materials & Technol...· 0 citations
Smart wearable biosensors are gaining attention because of their advancements and ability to detect health biomarkers by analysing physiological fluids, specifically sweat, saliva, tears, interstitial fluid, urine, wound exudate and respiratory breath, using a non‐invasive and microneedle‐based approach. This review cr...
S. Bhowmik, Azam Ali· Small Structures· 0 citations
This review proposes an artificial intelligence (AI)-ready framework for multimodal wearable biochemical monitoring and highlights recurring gaps in biofluid validity, real-world robustness, reference-comparator alignment, subgroup evidence, and algorithmic governance.
Ahmet Akif Kızılkurtlu, Ali Akpek· Biosensors· 0 citations
This review provides a comprehensive overview of design strategies for in vivo biosensors, categorized into three implantation approaches: material-based implants, injectable microdevices, and surgical implants and discusses the historical development, state-of-the-art examples, and design considerations for each strat...
This review evaluates the development and analytical potential of near-field communication (NFC)-enabled wearable chemical sensors for bioanalytical monitoring, including passive, battery-free, energy-buffered, and hybrid-energy architectures. Moving beyond conventional wireless data transmission, we emphasize how NFC-...
Hang Che, Shi-Ping Gao, Si-Tong Chen et al.· Chemistry - An Asian Journal· 0 citations