2026· International journal of advanced engineering and management research· Vol 11, pp. 309-321· 0 citations· 8 references
TL;DR
The Governance Maturity Model is introduced, a five-level capability framework that evaluates an organization's readiness to implement adaptive, AI-enabled governance systems and provides a structured pathway for organizations seeking to modernize governance practices, strengthen accountability, and align oversight mechanisms with the demands of complex, dynamic risk environments.
Abstract
Governance systems across sectors vary widely in their ability to integrate artificial intelligence,
real-time monitoring, and adaptive oversight. While advanced organizations increasingly rely on
continuous sensing, data-driven decision-support, and event-validated learning, many institutions
remain anchored in reactive, compliance-centric governance models. This manuscript introduces
the Governance Maturity Model (GMM), a five-level capability framework that evaluates an
organization's readiness to implement adaptive, AI-enabled governance systems. The GMM
extends the Adaptive Governance Systems Framework (AGSF) and the AI-Enabled Governance
Oversight Model (AIGOM) by defining progressive stages of governance capability—from
reactive oversight to fully adaptive, intelligence-augmented governance ecosystems. The GMM
further establishes governance maturity as a dynamic institutional capability involving
governance observability, operational intelligence integration, adaptive recalibration, and crossdomain governance coordination within complex socio-technical environments. The model
provides a structured pathway for organizations seeking to modernize governance practices,
strengthen accountability, and align oversight mechanisms with the demands of complex,
dynamic risk environments.
This article examines three interconnected dimensions of responsible AI for enterprise modernization: governance infrastructure for accountable AI deployment, algorithmic equity in high-impact decision environments, and the evolving international regulatory landscape shaping enterprise AI governance.
M. Modi· International Journal of Eng...· 0 citations
This paper argues for a transition from AI Governance as Compliance to AI Governance Engineering , a systems-oriented discipline in which governance is embedded throughout the enterprise intelligence lifecycle, enabling enterprise intelligence systems that are secure, explainable, trustworthy, and governable by design.
Faruk Çelikkanat· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
Examining how artificial intelligence (AI) governance supports sustainable decision-making across organizational contexts in Europe reveals that governance increasingly aligns with formal frameworks through policies, dedicated structures, human oversight and Environmental, Social and Governance oriented indicators, enh...
Fernando Almeida· Journal of Ethics in Entrepr...· 0 citations
A lifecycle-oriented socio-technical governance capacity framework through a structured synthesis of public administration, digital government, decision support systems, responsible AI, socio-technical systems, sustainability, and risk governance scholarship is developed.
It is argued that a layered subsidiarity approach, with specific financing for capacity-building and technical standards that work across the board, is more likely to deliver effective global AI governance than calls for a binding treaty.
Asher Odhiambo Ojuok, Julius Murumba, E. Micheni· East African Journal of Info...· 0 citations
This study proposes Cognitive Governance Systems (CGS) Theory as an original explanatory framework of the interaction between human intelligence and machine intelligence in a co-decision making context of democratic government.
K. Kunwar· Journal of Advances in Socia...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.