Skip to content
Open access

Toward a Governance Maturity Model (GMM): A Capability-Based Framework for Adaptive, AI-Enabled Governance Systems

2026 · International journal of advanced engineering and management research · Vol 11, pp. 309-321 · 0 citations · 8 references

TL;DR

The Governance Maturity Model is introduced, a five-level capability framework that evaluates an organization's readiness to implement adaptive, AI-enabled governance systems and provides a structured pathway for organizations seeking to modernize governance practices, strengthen accountability, and align oversight mechanisms with the demands of complex, dynamic risk environments.

Abstract

Governance systems across sectors vary widely in their ability to integrate artificial intelligence, real-time monitoring, and adaptive oversight. While advanced organizations increasingly rely on continuous sensing, data-driven decision-support, and event-validated learning, many institutions remain anchored in reactive, compliance-centric governance models. This manuscript introduces the Governance Maturity Model (GMM), a five-level capability framework that evaluates an organization's readiness to implement adaptive, AI-enabled governance systems. The GMM extends the Adaptive Governance Systems Framework (AGSF) and the AI-Enabled Governance Oversight Model (AIGOM) by defining progressive stages of governance capability—from reactive oversight to fully adaptive, intelligence-augmented governance ecosystems. The GMM further establishes governance maturity as a dynamic institutional capability involving governance observability, operational intelligence integration, adaptive recalibration, and crossdomain governance coordination within complex socio-technical environments. The model provides a structured pathway for organizations seeking to modernize governance practices, strengthen accountability, and align oversight mechanisms with the demands of complex, dynamic risk environments.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Responsible AI Architecture in Enterprise Modernization: Governance Frameworks, Equity Implications, and Regulatory Convergence

This article examines three interconnected dimensions of responsible AI for enterprise modernization: governance infrastructure for accountable AI deployment, algorithmic equity in high-impact decision environments, and the evolving international regulatory landscape shaping enterprise AI governance.

M. Modi · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI Governance Engineering: A Framework for Secure, Explainable, and Trustworthy Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Systems

This paper argues for a transition from AI Governance as Compliance to AI Governance Engineering , a systems-oriented discipline in which governance is embedded throughout the enterprise intelligence lifecycle, enabling enterprise intelligence systems that are secure, explainable, trustworthy, and governable by design.

Faruk Çelikkanat · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Exploring AI governance for sustainable decision-making: evidence from six case studies

Examining how artificial intelligence (AI) governance supports sustainable decision-making across organizational contexts in Europe reveals that governance increasingly aligns with formal frameworks through policies, dedicated structures, human oversight and Environmental, Social and Governance oriented indicators, enh...

Fernando Almeida · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Sustainable Digital Governance of AI-Based Decision Support Systems in Public Administration: A Socio-Technical Capacity Framework

A lifecycle-oriented socio-technical governance capacity framework through a structured synthesis of public administration, digital government, decision support systems, responsible AI, socio-technical systems, sustainability, and risk governance scholarship is developed.

Cihan Necmi Günal · 1 citation
Review Open access Aug 2026

Governing Artificial Intelligence in a Fragmented World: Toward a Multi-Level Policy Framework for Global AI Governance

It is argued that a layered subsidiarity approach, with specific financing for capacity-building and technical standards that work across the board, is more likely to deliver effective global AI governance than calls for a binding treaty.

Asher Odhiambo Ojuok, Julius Murumba, E. Micheni · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Developing and Validating Cognitive Governance Systems (CGS) Theory: A Human–AI Co-Governance Framework for Democratic Decision-Making

This study proposes Cognitive Governance Systems (CGS) Theory as an original explanatory framework of the interaction between human intelligence and machine intelligence in a co-decision making context of democratic government.

K. Kunwar · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.