This work identifies Constrained Correlation Clustering as a variant of Correlation Clustering for which optimal approximations might be within reach, and significantly tighten the gap, by showing that the optimal approximation factor lies in $[2,\frac{16}{7}-\gamma)$ for a small constant $0$.
Abstract
In the Correlation Clustering problem, we are given an undirected graph and are tasked with computing a clustering (partition of the nodes) that minimizes the number of violated pairs (edges across different clusters plus non-edges within clusters). In the constrained version of this problem, the goal is to compute a clustering that satisfies additional hard constraints mandating certain pairs to be in the same cluster and certain pairs to be in different clusters. In this work, we identify Constrained Correlation Clustering as a variant of Correlation Clustering for which optimal approximations might be within reach, and make progress towards this front. Constrained Correlation Clustering is APX-Hard, and the optimal approximation factor is known to lie in $(\frac{24}{23},3]$. We significantly tighten this gap, by showing that the optimal approximation factor lies in $[2,\frac{16}{7}-\gamma)$ for a small constant $\gamma>0$. Our lower bound of $2$ shows a separation between Correlation Clustering (which admits an $1.485+\epsilon$ approximation) and Constrained Correlation Clustering\footnote{The same hardness result was obtained independently by Cao and Xu~\cite{cao2026clusterdeletionhardapproximate}.}. Our upper bound of $\frac{16}{7}-\gamma$ uses the Sherali-Adams relaxation and goes beyond straightforward Triangle-Based analysis; more precisely, our algorithm belongs to a natural class of pivoting algorithms for which we prove that a straightforward Triangle-Based analysis cannot prove a better-than-$\frac{16}{7}$ approximation. Finally, as a byproduct of our techniques, we completely resolve the approximability of Cluster Deletion. Cluster Deletion is a well-studied special case of Constrained Correlation Clustering for which a $2$-approximation algorithm is known. We show that this is optimal, as our lower bound holds even for this special case.
For graph instances both for the min-max and the min-disagreement objectives, this work proves approximation guarantees that are substantially better than the bounds achievable for general graphs.
N. RajathRaoK, Jens Schlöter, Sami Davies et al.· 0 citations
We study the \emph{connected $k$-median} clustering problem, a clustering problem that augments the classical $k$-median objective with connectivity constraints. We focus on the \emph{overlapping} variant of the problem, where clusters are allowed to share vertices. In addition to a metric space $(V,d)$, the input cont...
Kushagra Chatterjee, Rojin Rezvan, A. Vakilian· 0 citations
This work uses Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to solve Inductive Correlation Clustering, a novel generalization of the CC problem designed to handle unseen graph instances, and indicates that the method serves as an efficient pooling layer, enhancing the ability of GNNs to capture hierarchical structural information in n...
Francesco Paolo Nerini, Francesco Bonchi, Arijit Khan et al.· 0 citations
Many existing clustering methods are designed based on a set-oriented definition---a cluster is a set of similar points---relying a point-to-point similarity function to find similar points. This works well for compact clusters, but clustering performance can deteriorate badly when cluster shapes are irregular, and den...
Kaifeng Zhang, K. Ting, S. Chawla· arXiv.org· 0 citations
The cost of a hierarchical clustering can be represented by an ultrametric whose lowest-common-ancestor labels are cluster cardinalities. We relate this known representation to the shortest-path geometry of a similarity graph. For a connected support graph $G$, let $d_G$ be its unit-length shortest-path metric and let...
By using a simple textbook reduction from vertex cover, we show that the following three problems are all UG-hard to approximate with constant-factor smaller than two; minimum weakness strong triadic closure, cluster deletion and constrained correlation clustering. Additionally, we analyze the well-known low-diameter d...
Florian Adriaens· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.