This work introduces UAV3DCrop, a public benchmark of repeated multi-angle unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) crop surveys, and evaluates seven scene-optimized methods -- Neural Radiance Field and 3D Gaussian Splatting variants -- on held-out views, photogrammetry-referenced depth, and canopy-height recovery.
Abstract
Accurate 3D crop monitoring underpins data-driven precision agriculture by enabling field-scale analysis of plant structure, growth dynamics, and management response. Modern 3D reconstruction methods perform strongly on generic benchmarks, but rendered appearance may not translate into metrically and agronomically useful geometry in crop fields. We introduce UAV3DCrop, a public benchmark of repeated multi-angle unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) crop surveys. It contains 88,830 RGB images at $5280 \times 3956$ pixels, with a ground sampling distance of 3.6-5.8 mm, from 91 scenes spanning corn, soybean, wheat, and oat. Track A evaluates seven scene-optimized methods -- Neural Radiance Field (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) variants -- on held-out views, photogrammetry-referenced depth, and canopy-height recovery. Track B tests four pretrained feed-forward models on zero-shot camera-pose and geometry estimation. The scene-optimized methods rank differently across the three targets: Splatfacto-big leads appearance, whereas Scaffold-GS leads depth and is statistically tied with Splatfacto for canopy height. Among feed-forward models, MapAnything leads on seven of the eight metrics, while the remaining models vary more across crops and fail severely on absolute scale in a way that alignment conceals. Repeated acquisitions reveal further sensitivities that differ by output type and by model, associated with position within the acquisition sequence and with tie-point multiplicity. Current 3D reconstruction methods are therefore not yet interchangeable for agronomic use: no single method wins on appearance, geometry, and canopy height at once, and only one of four feed-forward models recovers usable metric scale. The dataset is publicly available at https://link-dev.github.io/UAV3DCrop/
For high-precision unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) visual relocalization in large-scale aircraft inspection, this paper proposes an improved 3DGS method integrating visual geometry grounded transformer (VGGT) with LiDAR and designs a coarse-to-fine two-stage image matching strategy to tackle the challenge. First, the low...
Xin Wang, Zi-Jian Kang, Yu Cai et al.· AIP Advances· 0 citations
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based multispectral imaging enables flexible, non-destructive crop monitoring. Although UAV imagery offers much higher spatial resolution than satellite platforms, its effective spatial detail at typical operational flight altitudes can still be insufficient for plant-level interpretation...
Whanjo Jung, S. Wi, Jae-Hyun Ryu et al.· Remote Sensing· 0 citations
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry requires camera networks that provide sufficient surface coverage, image overlap, parallax, and resolution, yet conventional flight patterns are often poorly adapted to scene geometry resulting in local reconstruction errors. This paper proposes an iterative hybrid discrete-...
Alana Grech, Daniel Pisani, Andrew Grima et al.· 0 citations
Existing feed-forward 3D reconstruction methods typically process a bounded number of images and recover cameras and geometry in local or internally normalized frames. Extending them to large-scale UAV mapping requires scalable multi-chunk processing and reliable aggregation, while full Sim(3) alignment can become unst...
Xiang-Hui Yang, Yongli Wang, Yunsheng Zhang et al.· 1 citation
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly utilized across military, civilian, and agricultural sectors, necessitating accurate and efficient 3D target localization. Traditional 2D detectors lack depth perception, while stereo vision and LiDAR have range-dependent and hardware limitations, respectively. To addres...
Yan-Xin Sun, Ming-Ming Ma, Lan-Yu Sun et al.· Electronics· 0 citations
Canopy 3D architecture is a critical determinant of light interception, photosynthetic efficiency, and final yield in cotton, yet its rapid and accurate characterisation remains challenging in field conditions. To achieve efficient, non-destructive, and quantitative monitoring of the canopy structure of field-grown cot...