Skip to content
Open access

Environmental and occupational exposure in newly diagnosed lung cancer- data from the PROTEON study.

Sep 2026 · Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine · 0 citations · 20 references
Medicine

Abstract

Background

Environmental (E) and occupational (O) lung cancer (LC) is under-reported. Raising the awareness for this problem could help optimize prevention and screening.

Methods

In 181 consecutive non-small cell LC patients (January 2023-December 2024, University Hospital of Liège, Belgium) E risk factors (RF) and ORF were collected through a self-reporting questionnaire (open and direct questions) with sociodemographic, tumor- and work-related data. The primary objective was to identify ERF and ORF prevalence.

Results

Mean age was 68.2 ± 8.8 years, 55.8% males, 93.4% (former) smokers. Half of the patients (53%) lived in (peri-)urban areas. 50% disclosed an obstructive airway disease and 31.5% had a positive LC family history. Of the 270 jobs registered, 78.5% were manual. Only 23.8% of the workers used protective equipment. 72.4% of the patients reported exposure to at least one ORF through direct questions and the most frequent pulmonary carcinogens were asbestos (36.5%), silica (22.1%), welding fumes (15.5%), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (14.9%) and diesel engine exhaust (14.4%). Overall, 93.9% of patients reported at least one E/ORF other than tobacco. A request for compensation was introduced in <3% of the patients.

Conclusion

Non-tobacco RF for LC are virtually always present in non-small cell LC patients and under-reported. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 5,602,259).

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.