Inpatient Versus Outpatient Diagnosis of Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Differences in Stage, Risk Factors, and Surgical Outcomes.
TL;DR
Patients diagnosed with gastric cancer in the inpatient setting represent a distinct cohort not captured by risk indicators that prompt opportunistic endoscopic evaluation in the absence of US screening guidelines, and subgroups may benefit from targeted screening.
Abstract
PurposeThere is no standard gastric cancer screening in the United States. To understand populations at risk, we describe patients by diagnosis setting.MethodsSingle-institution, retrospective cohort study (2016-2023). Adults who underwent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.ResultsPatients with inpatient diagnoses of gastric cancer (n = 29) were less likely to be Asian (62% vs 82%, P = 0.009) or have family history (17% vs 45%, P = 0.006), and more likely to have non-curative surgery (24% vs 2%, P < 0.001), higher pathological stage (54% vs 23%, P = 0.002), lymphovascular invasion (52% vs 21%, P = 0.005), longer length of stay (8 days [IQR 5.5-16.5] vs 5 days [IQR 4.0-7.0], P < 0.001), and 90-day postoperative complications (40% vs 21%, P = 0.048).ConclusionPatients diagnosed with gastric cancer in the inpatient setting represent a distinct cohort not captured by risk indicators (family history, East Asian ancestry, prior H. pylori) that prompt opportunistic endoscopic evaluation in the absence of US screening guidelines. Subgroups may benefit from targeted screening.