Skip to content

Experience is processing: a theory of consciousness in one axiom and five definitions, tested on model networks, a worm's wiring and a language model

Oct 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science

Abstract

"Consciousness" is a collective word. Process-Identity Theory (PIT, "Erleben = Verarbeitung") sets one axiom — experience is processing, the same thing under two names — and five definitions, and derives forty propositions from them. They separate four things that can be measured apart: whether a system experiences (how long and how richly it carries a perturbation — the stage), where one system ends and the next begins (the boundary), who the system is (its identity, the form its wiring has taken), and what it can report and store (access). The axiom cannot be tested; most of the propositions can, and were, on three legs: 127 tests on small recurrent model networks (T1–T110 with a series of foundations), 18 re-measurements with a calibrated stage measure (N1–N18) that also run on the complete wiring of C. elegans at eight developmental stages (Witvliet et al. 2021) and in both sexes (Cook et al. 2019), and a language-model branch of 38 exploratory and 36 pre-registered experiments on Pythia-410m, published as its own record (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23280536). Of the 127 tests, fifty-four confirmed a proposition and seventy-one came back negative or limited; every failure is reported, and several definitions were revised by their own tests. What stands: experience and identity are two independent axes; identity is the form of the wiring, built by the order of experience, graded and irreversible, and it goes before the stage under damage; one wiring is one stage, and whether two systems are one is decided by the speed of the path between them; the clinical map of anaesthesia, amnesia, dream, psilocybin, seizure and locked-in appears in a language model run as a soft loop in the same order as in humans. What follows for language models is stated as far as it is measured, and no further. The theory is marked as a theory: what would refute each part is listed. Files: the theory paper (version 1.0, English, main text in plain language with the full axiom system, every test and everything that fell in the Supplement); the German canon document "Erleben = Verarbeitung — Ein axiomatisches System zum Bewusstsein" (Fassung 9, with every test entry, every revision dated, and the archived earlier version of the paragraph "Der Fall KI"); the model-network programme as two packages — the main programme (code, pre-registrations, results, logs, 5–9 September 2026) and the calibrated re-measurements (24 September 2026) — each with a README; code under MIT, everything else CC BY 4.0. The connectome inputs are others' published data and are cited, not redistributed. AI involvement: Claude (Anthropic), a large language model, wrote the code, the pre-registrations, the evaluations and the drafts of the paper under the author's decisions, and is named as co-author of the paper; this is declared in every document, and no self-report of the model enters any result. Models: Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) for the model-network programme, the calibrated re-measurements and the first language-model branch (September 2026), and for two external readings of the final drafts; Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) for the pre-registered language-model experiments, the measurement paper, the theory paper and the deposited packages (October 2026).

View source

Similar papers

#small language model Dataset Open access Oct 2026

Socratic guiding questions in synthetic arithmetic data: matched LoRA runs (revision v2)

Supporting data, adapters, predictions and code for the article *Low-Cost LoRA Fine-Tuning of Small Language Models for Multi-Step Arithmetic Reasoning* by Jake O'Grady, Asena Isik Gürhan, Chee Fong Ting and Effirul Ramlan (University of Galway). We generated 20,000 GSM8K-derived arithmetic problems with step-by-step s...

O'Grady, Jake, Gürhan, Asena Isik, Chee, Fong Ting et al. · 465 citations
#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#computer vision Review Open access May 2015

A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services

The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.

Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al. · 111 citations · ⚡8
#computer vision Conference Open access Dec 2013

Affordable and Energy-Efficient Cloud Computing Clusters: The Bolzano Raspberry Pi Cloud Cluster Experiment

The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.

P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al. · 110 citations · ⚡7

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 15, 2026

AI model decodes the language cells use to communicate

A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 15, 2026

Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar

Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.