A Topology-Aware LLM-Augmented Digital Twin Framework for Scalable IoT Device Management

Abstract

The growing scale and dynamic nature of Internet of Things (IoT) deployments demand management approaches that can maintain accurate system awareness. Existing large language models (LLMs) can reduce the interface burden of network management. However, without explicit grounding in the physical system state, they may generate nonexistent devices, incorrect topological relations, or non-executable management actions. To address this problem, this paper proposes a digital twin (DT) grounded LLM augmented management framework for IoT device management. The framework uses the DT as a structured state source, allowing the model to access topology consistent device, connection, and status information before generating management responses. A topology importance driven adapter training method, implemented through Hierarchical Importance Organizer (HIO), is further developed to encode hierarchical paths and critical nodes into training samples. We further characterize how grounded management degrades as the DT drifts from the physical topology, isolating the robustness contribution of topology-aware adaptation. Across 34,200 completed per-sample model outputs, including a 7,200-output main benchmark and a 27,000-output topology-drift sweep, HIO is evaluated against schema-only prompting, a base plus DT model, and a GenTwin-like adapter. On the 1,800-sample main benchmark, HIO achieves 0.869 Direct F1, improving over the GenTwin-like adapter by 3.3 points and over the base plus DT model by 29.1 points. HIO also improves Exact Match from 0.753 to 0.827. The gain is most pronounced in topology-sensitive impact analysis, where HIO improves Direct F1 from 0.784 to 0.918. HIO has positive gains in all nine topology–scale cells, with 95% confidence intervals excluding zero in seven cells. Under DT topology drift, HIO consistently outperforms the GenTwin-like adapter over $\delta \in [{0, 0.20}]$ and degrades more slowly, with Direct F1 degradation slopes of −0.157 versus −0.189.