Skip to content
Preprint

COMIC: Reference-Aware Safety Gating for Multimodal Large Language Models

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 60 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is suggested that multimodal safety cannot be enforced reliably without modeling the requested operation, the visual target to which it applies, and the confidence of that grounding.

Abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used to interact with screenshots, scanned documents, diagrams, and other visually grounded inputs. This shift introduces a new safety risk: in many multimodal jailbreaks, neither the prompt nor the image is harmful in isolation. Unsafe behavior emerges only when the model binds an apparently benign operation, such as summarizing, translating, or following, to a localized visual target. This reveals a structural weakness in current multimodal defenses, which largely moderate the prompt-image pair as a whole even though the true security-relevant unit is the grounded operation-target pair produced during dereference. In this work, we identify and analyze this reference-dependent failure mode and show that existing defenses degrade when harmful semantics are localized, activated only after grounding, and dependent on visual reference resolution. To address this problem, we propose COMIC (Context-Operation-Modality-Image-Classifier), a reference-aware pre-generation safety gate for MLLMs. COMIC first infers the requested operation and reference type, constructs candidate targets from OCR and open-vocabulary proposals, grounds plausible referents, and evaluates safety over explicit operation-target pairs. To handle ambiguity conservatively, COMIC combines max-risk aggregation with quality-aware routing before deciding whether to forward or block a request. We evaluate COMIC across multiple open-source MLLMs, localized and broader multimodal jailbreak benchmarks, and benign reference-sensitive settings. The results show that COMIC consistently improves robustness while preserving benign utility and practical efficiency. More broadly, our findings suggest that multimodal safety cannot be enforced reliably without modeling the requested operation, the visual target to which it applies, and the confidence of that grounding.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

MMAligner: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models through Representation Calibration

Experiments show that MMAligner raises the average refusal rate on unsafe multimodal inputs to 99% with less than 2% utility degradation and minimal training data, substantially improving the safety-utility trade-off over existing baselines.

Shenyi Zhang, Keyan Guo, Zihao Wang et al. · 0 citations
Jun 2026

Harnessing Textual Refusal Directions for Multimodal Safety

Modality-Agnostic Refusal Steering (MARS), a light-weight training-free approach that injects multimodal safety without the need for multimodal safety data, achieves consistent safety gains while preserving utility.

Moreno D'Incà, Massimiliano Mancini, N. Sebe · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

When Prompts Become Pixels: Prompt-Region Grounding for Multimodal Reasoning

This work introduces Visualized Task Semantics (VTS), a controlled intervention that moves the question into the image while keeping the source problem and answer fixed, and requires no OCR or region metadata at inference.

Yongxin Wang, Ruizhe Zhou, Yueling Tang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Overloading Large Vision-Language Models for Jailbreaking

This work proposes a novel information overloading method that is equipped with both extensive text and multi-dimensional image attacks, underscoring the need for stronger defenses against complex multimodal jailbreak inputs.

Haoyu Zhang, Yangyang Guo, Mohan S. Kankanhalli · 0 citations
Jun 2026

MultModLM: A multi-modal benchmark for Large-Language Model based hardware schematic generation

This work introduces MultModLM, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs on the task of generating hardware schematics from RTL (Register Transfer Level) descriptions, and finds that LLM-based evaluators exhibit near-zero agreement with human raters, revealing that LLM-as-a-judge paradigms are unreliable in structurally precise domains.

Dhruva Kulkarni, Sai Manoj Pudukotai Dinkarrao · 0 citations