Skip to content

On the Design Space of Continuous Diffusion Language Models

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 74 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is shown that self-conditioning corrects a train/inference mismatch by exposing the model to inference-like states that are otherwise rare during training, and cross-entropy drives embeddings towards a geometry whose decoding error rate closely matches the one-hot one.

Abstract

Continuous diffusion language models (CDLMs) promise to bring the benefits of continuous flow modelling to language, including accelerated sampling and controllable generation. The field has grown rapidly, and the capabilities of CDLMs have begun to rival those of discrete diffusion. Yet, unlike for continuous modalities such as images or videos, our grasp of the levers that matter when training CDLMs remains limited. In this work, we focus on two of these levers, namely self-conditioning and embedding geometry, and shed light on some of the mechanisms behind them, which in turn suggest cheaper and more effective designs. We begin by showing that self-conditioning corrects a train/inference mismatch by exposing the model to inference-like states that are otherwise rare during training. These gains can be recovered without an extra forward pass by a two-level interpolant, coined $\mathrm{DoubleCat}$, which improves TinyGSM accuracy more than threefold. Self-conditioning also aids in recognising tokens dominated by large-norm Gaussians$\unicode{x2013}$an issue known as token identifiability. To address it directly, we introduce discrete reveals to $\mathrm{DoubleCat}$, yielding $\mathrm{SemiCat}$, which achieves discrete diffusion-level performance on TinyGSM, reaching $49.94\%$ with standard training hyperparameters and a tuned sampler. At the $1.7$B scale, $\mathrm{SemiCat}$ outperforms discrete diffusion on four of six likelihood-based evaluations, and surpasses one-hot flows on unconditional generation. On embedded spaces, we find that cross-entropy drives embeddings towards a geometry whose decoding error rate closely matches the one-hot one. We briefly explore a range of further options, such as hybrid corruption processes and noise schedules, including asynchronous ones. We believe this exploration can help the community better understand and advance the design space of CDLMs.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Denoising Hierarchical Representations: Joint Continuous Diffusion for Language Modeling

H-CDLMs is introduced, a simple framework that further improves continuous DLMs with minimal compute and parameter overhead and applies H-CDLM to the flow matching model FLM, obtaining consistent gains with H-FLM and demonstrating that the framework generalizes across continuous generative paradigms.

Mathias Ollu, Nikos Komodakis · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

An overview of discrete diffusion models in natural language processing

Discrete Diffusion Models (DDMs) have recently emerged as a promising paradigm for text generation, providing an alternative to the dominant autoregressive (AR) approach. Unlike AR models that rely on sequential decoding and suffer from exposure bias, DDMs operate in discrete token space through iterative denoising, en...

Yi-Xuan Li, Kai-Dong Yu, Shuang-Yong Song et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

GRAFT: Restoring the Missing Sampling Interface in Continuous Diffusion Language Models

Continuous diffusion language models generate a whole sequence in parallel, never drawing a single word at any intermediate step; only the final step turns embeddings into text. Models such as ELF now report autoregressive-level quality at a fraction of the sampling steps of discrete-token diffusion models, and this de...

Hao Yang, Li-Li Pan · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Designing Transformers for Continuous Diffusion Language Models

Continuous diffusion language models (CDLMs) offer an alternative approach to parallel language generation; however, most existing studies directly use transformer architectures from either causal large language models (LLMs) or Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) for image generation, which were not optimized for CDLMs. In...

Wei-Jian Luo, Yu-Jian Chen, Hao-Chen Jiang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Large Language Continuous Diffusion Models

Despite the success of discrete diffusion language models (dLMs) for fast parallel decoding, their non-smooth, high-dimensional space hinders trajectory steering for reasoning and inference acceleration. To overcome this, we present Sigma, the first large-scale (3B/8B) continuous dLM built on steerable, low-dimensional...

Zhi-Han Yang, Wei Guo, Jean-Marie Lemercier et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

Scaling and Distilling Text Embeddings for Better Diffusibility

Diffusion language models (DLMs) offer a promising alternative to autoregressive (AR) language generation. Recent advances in continuous DLMs, which apply latent diffusion to continuous text embeddings, raise a practical question: which embedding makes the best latent space, i.e., the most diffusible? To answer this, w...

Ze-Kai Zhang, Yun-Jie Tian, Yan-Jin He et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.