We study a graph simplification problem introduced by Bernstein, Bodwin, and Wein [ITCS'24]. We start with a graph with arbitrarily large positive edge weights and the goal is to reweight the edges to small aspect ratio (ratio between largest and smallest weight) while preserving the shortest paths structure (the sequence of vertices and edges along shortest paths). They studied whether polynomial aspect ratio is always possible. They proved that for general graphs, both directed and undirected, it is not: there exist graphs for which any shortest-paths preserving reweighting requires exponential aspect ratio. In contrast, they showed that every DAG (directed acyclic graph) admits a reweighting with linear aspect ratio. However, the resulting edge weights are not integers. This motivated them to pose the open question of whether all DAGs admit a reweighting with polynomially-bounded integer edge weights. Our main result is to answer this question in the negative: we prove that there exist DAGs for which any shortest-paths preserving integer reweighting requires weights of size $2^{\Omega(n)}$. In fact, this is even true when the DAG has very simple structure: 3 layers of vertices with only 3 vertices in the middle layer. In contrast, we show that if the number of vertices in the middle layer is decreased to 2, then a linear upper bound is possible. We extend our exponential lower bound to the approximate version of the problem where only a single $\alpha$-approximate shortest path in the original graph must be preserved as an exact shortest path in the reweighted graph. Our exponential lower bound holds even for any finite approximation ratio $\alpha>1$.
This paper develops an exact algorithm based on the Branch and Bound approach for solving PIDS on chordal graphs, which involves identifying the smallest group of vertices in a given network that maximizes influence throughout the network.
This paper generalises the existing PTAS for complete graphs from a fixed to an arbitrary number of intervals and disprove an existing conjecture, which states that every instance of BIA admits a solution satisfying at least three quarters of all edges.
We study the classical and parameterized complexity of efficient connected allocation problems on graphs, where efficiency is measured by egalitarian and utilitarian welfare maximization. We first establish a sharp complexity dichotomy in the classical setting: both problems are NP-hard in general and remain hard even on very restricted graph classes such as paths, and consequently trees and cycles. In contrast, they are polynomial-time solvable on stars, but this tractability does not extend even to the case of two disjoint stars. Motivated by these boundaries, we move to the parameterized complexity framework, where we study the problem with respect to the number of agents. We obtain fixed-parameter tractability (FPT) on trees and, more generally, identify a robust phenomenon whereby tractability on a connected graph class extends to disjoint unions of graphs from that class. We further investigate the parameters treewidth and treedepth, showing that the utilitarian version is FPT for both, whereas the egalitarian version remains para-NP-hard even on graphs of treedepth two. Finally, we analyze the number of connected components and show that except for the collection of stars, the problems remain hard. For the collection of stars,while we obtain para-NP-hardness for the egalitarian case, the utilitarian case gives W[2]-hardness together with an XP algorithm.
It is proved that Minimal-to-Maximal Conversion Search is in fact not output-polynomial and the lower bound construction motivates a more detailed analysis of how certain heuristic choices in the algorithm design affect the running time.
The degree/diameter problem asks for the largest order of a graph with a given diameter and maximum vertex degree. This has been widely studied and given rise to a recent variation for mixed graphs (graphs with both undirected edges and directed arcs), where an additional bound is placed on the maximum directed out-degree of any vertex. Both problems have applications to network design. Counting the possible number of vertices at each distance from a given vertex gives a bound on the order of a mixed graph satisfying the degree and diameter constraints (the mixed Moore bound). In this paper, we settle an open problem posed by Tuite and Erskine concerning the total regularity of mixed graphs whose order is one less than the mixed Moore bound (almost mixed Moore graphs). We use this result to show that the three known almost mixed Moore graphs of diameter at least three are the only such mixed graphs.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.
