Skip to content

Efficient GPU Retrieval for Semantic Search

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 36 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A policy-aligned retrieval framework that improves offline relevance over a matched-capacity baseline, with gains broadly distributed across facet combinations, and serves this framework with a two-stage GPU architecture.

Abstract

Semantic Search on LinkedIn must retrieve relevant profiles from a corpus of hundreds of millions in response to natural-language queries such as"a fintech founder in Berlin who worked in payments."The deployed relevance policy is bottleneck-oriented: every active non-negotiable facet must be satisfied, and a pre-existing LLM Graded Relevance (GR) judge operationalizes this through a fixed min/median aggregation over facet grades. Cosine similarity instead averages evidence, letting a strong match on one facet mask failure on another, capping the recall of the first-stage (L0) retriever. We present a policy-aligned retrieval framework: embeddings are partitioned into eight category-supervised segments whose scores follow the same min/median rule at serving time; for multi-vector retrieval, this segment score is computed independently per tagged document slot and maximized across slots. A lightweight single-slot Stage-1 scorer generates high-recall candidates, while scale-invariant relative-norm gating keeps category activation consistent across training, evaluation, and serving. On 21K held-out queries, this representation improves offline relevance over a matched-capacity baseline, with gains broadly distributed across facet combinations. We serve this framework with a two-stage GPU architecture: an FP8 coarse ranker scores the full corpus, increasing per-shard capacity by 71% and Stage-1 matmul throughput by 36%, then an FP16 stage exactly re-ranks an oversampled candidate set, recovering 99.6-99.8% of full-FP16 recall at over 500 QPS per shard replica. In a member-randomized A/B test, exploratory-query Precision@10 under the unchanged GR judge rises from 63.7% to 79.0% and navigational Precision@1 from 65.5% to 74.7%, with a blinded human evaluation independently confirming the Precision@10 gain.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Difficulty-Gated Fusion of Reasoning Views for Temporal Retrieval

This work proposes query-difficulty-gated fusion of reasoning views, a fused ranking that uses no relevance labels at inference, no re-ranking, and no fine-tuning of the retriever; the gate is trained leave-one-task-out.

J. Holdcroft, Abdelrahman Abdallah, Adam Jatowt · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

CeQe: Grounding Lexical Retrieval in Semantic Evidence

This work presents Cross-Encoder Query Expansion (CE-QE), which reads the per-token relevance attributions of a cross-encoder applied to top semantic search results, selects the terms the cross-encoder treats as decisive, and appends them to the BM25 query.

Adam Kahirov, Umesh Deshpande, S. Sundararaman · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Learning from What You Retrieve: Online RL Fine-Tuning for Semantic Retrieval

This work proposes PAO (Positive-Advantage-Only), a selective RL optimization method that selectively applies gradient updates only to retrieved items with positive advantages, effectively pulling query embed- dings toward high-reward regions while preserving global topo- logical stability.

Shao-Wei Wei, Chong Huang, Songtao Fang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

VARG: Value-Aware and Ranking-Aligned Generative Retrieval for Dynamic E-commerce Search

Integrating recall and pre-ranking in e-commerce search requires candidate generation to account for relevance, personalization, and business value before final ranking. To this end, we present VARG, a generative retrieval system for Tmall App search that directly admits generated item candidates to the existing final...

Xiao-Peng Chu, Jian-Bo Zhu, Ming-Min Jin et al. · 1 citation

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.