Skip to content

Towards a Systems Foundation for Agentic Skills: Architecture, Lifecycle, and Security

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 156 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A unified systems foundation and reference architecture for the agentic skills ecosystem is established, formalize skills as externalized procedural knowledge bridging high-level cognitive planning with deterministic execution environments, and systematically delineate the architecture across a nine-stage lifecycle.

Abstract

Autonomous large language model (LLM) agents increasingly face reliability, context consumption, and execution stability bottlenecks when deployed on complex, long-horizon tasks. While monolithic prompt engineering and stateless tool-calling paradigms struggle to scale, the field is rapidly converging toward \emph{agentic skills}: modular procedural abstractions that externalize execution knowledge into reusable, executable, and portable artifacts. This paper establishes a unified systems foundation and reference architecture for the agentic skills ecosystem. We formalize skills as externalized procedural knowledge bridging high-level cognitive planning with deterministic execution environments, and systematically delineate the architecture across a nine-stage lifecycle: autonomous discovery, authoring and representation formats, memory storage, dynamic retrieval and routing, composition and orchestration, execution and repair, lifelong adaptation, empirical evaluation, and security governance. We further examine marketplace dynamics, public registries, and emerging adversarial threat vectors, alongside runtime verification and defense mechanisms. Finally, we categorize system implementations across software engineering, operating system navigation, embodied robotics, and scientific discovery, while highlighting critical open challenges in continual learning and benchmark realism. This work establishes agentic skills as a foundational paradigm for building scalable, robust, and verifiable autonomous language agents.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

Trustworthy Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Cybersecurity and Systems Survey on Threat Landscapes, Defense Architectures, and Open Challenges

This survey systematically analyze threat surfaces across intra-execution loops and interaction planes, formulate a multi-layered zero-trust defense-in-depth architecture integrating Dual-LLM isolation, Capability-Based Access Control, kernel eBPF probes, and sandboxed runtimes, and map technical controls to internatio...

Seyedakbar Mostafavi · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

Trustworthy Agentic AI: Failure Modes, Mitigation Strategies, and a Lifecycle Framework for Autonomous LLM Systems

Agentic AI systems built on large language models can plan over multiple steps, use external tools, retain information in memory, and coordinate with other agents. These capabilities make them more useful than static language models, but they also introduce new security and operational risks. Untrusted content from web...

Fayeq Jeelani Syed, Rehan Ahmad, Ali Al Bataineh et al. · 0 citations
#small language model Preprint Aug 2026

Apodex 1.1: Scaling Agentic Intelligence for Complex Work

Apodex 1.1 reaches the leading performance band despite using a substantially smaller model than many frontier systems, and the 35B-parameter Apodex 1.1 Mini further retains strong working capability in a locally deployable form.

B. An, B. Li, B. Wang et al. · 3 citations · ⚡1
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

AgentAudit: An Open, Extensible Framework for Full-Lifecycle Trust Evaluation of AI Agents

Existing evaluation frameworks mostly assess only one part of AI agents, such as task completion (AgentBench) or security robustness (AgentDojo, ASB), rather than the complete pipeline of planning, tool selection, tool execution, memory and reasoning. Failures can occur at any stage, yet existing benchmarks rarely iden...

S. Nag, Sachita, Abhishek Kumar Singh et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

REDAgentBench: Executable Red Teaming and Faithful Measurement of LLM Agent Systems

RedAgentBench is introduced, an executable framework for autonomous red-teaming and faithful measurement that shows that executable evaluation can improve safety measurement and identify actionable intervention points.

Zixing Chen, Xingyuan Liu, Jie Zhu et al. · 3 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.