May 2026· arXiv.org· Vol abs/2605.29089· 0 citations· 36 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
The OISD framework is proposed, which improves reasoning by transferring on-policy predictive signals from the final layer to intermediate representations and employs signed advantage-weighted Jensen--Shannon alignment to distill informative intermediate representations while preserving policy consistency under a unified acting policy.
Abstract
Recent reinforcement learning (RL) post-training approaches primarily optimize the final output policy using sparse outcome-level rewards, while largely overlooking predictive signals encoded in intermediate representations. In this paper, we introduce a new paradigm called on-policy internal self-distillation and propose the OISD framework, which improves reasoning by transferring on-policy predictive signals from the final layer to intermediate representations. During rollout and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) optimization, the final layer acts as both the policy and a detached internal teacher for selected intermediate layers, which are guided to align with it through two complementary mechanisms: logit alignment, which transfers high-level reasoning behaviors (how to think), and attention alignment, which enforces consistent attention patterns (where to look) from the final layer to the selected intermediate layer, both without requiring external privileged information. Our OISD, together with GRPO, employs signed advantage-weighted Jensen--Shannon alignment to distill informative intermediate representations while preserving policy consistency under a unified acting policy. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of OISD, with substantial and consistent improvements over strong reasoning RL baselines across four mathematical reasoning tasks. The code will be released at https://github.com/THE-MALT-LAB/OISD
This work proposes self-instructing policy optimization (SIPO) with a contrastive self-teacher to provide dense credit, and demonstrates that SIPO outperforms both RLVR and OPSD baselines without an external teacher or additional generation.
Zhenrui Yue, Hui-Min Zeng, Yue-Qi Wang et al.· 0 citations
The findings support on-policy distillation as an effective warmup for agentic RLVR and identify initial reward discovery as a mechanism that can contribute to the observed acceleration.
Yi-Tong Qiao, Tian-Tian He, Lei Liu et al.· 0 citations
It is shown that a simple two-stage scheme, OPD-then-RL, consistently outperforms pure OPD, pure RLVR, and all such joint baselines across logic and math reasoning benchmarks.
Bo-Yang Li, Bingsen Chen, Cheng-Hao Yang et al.· 9 citations
Language-model agents are usually trained by reinforcement learning from one reward per episode, and privileged self-distillation enriches it by letting the same policy, given a skill, teach its skill-free self through token probabilities. However, we identify two phenomena that question this channel. Invisible Advanta...
Mu-Yang Li, Jie Yang, Zheng-Yu Fang et al.· 1 citation· ⚡1
This work proposes Reasoning-Progress-Aware Reward Filtering for On-Policy Distillation (R2-OPD), which constructs two within-trajectory rankings of reasoning spans, one from teacher-derived rewards and the other from independently estimated progress reward.
Chen Yang, Hai-Yuan Wan, Rengrong Xiong et al.· 2 citations
Self-OPD is introduced, a teacher-free OPD framework for flow matching models that turns the student's own self-exploration into step-wise supervision and outperforms prior RL and OPD methods without task-specific teachers.
Shi-Yi Zhang, Mu-Shui Liu, Yunze Tong et al.· 1 citation
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
Exploring how generative AI could make machine vision more accessible to businesses. The post GenEye in a Box: Making Machine Vision Something You Can Just Ask For appeared first on GPT-Lab.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.